» Articles » PMID: 3339027

The Relation Between the Resultant Moments at a Joint and the Moments Measured by an Isokinetic Dynamometer

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 1988 Jan 1
PMID 3339027
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Isokinetic dynamometers have frequently been used to determine in vivo properties of human skeletal muscles. In these investigations the moments recorded by the dynamometer were often (implicitly) assumed to be the same as the joint moments produced by muscles. This assumption may have contributed to the conflicting results about in vivo muscle properties of human skeletal muscles that are reported in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to present a method for calculating the resultant joint moments from the moments recorded using a Cybex II dynamometer and to determine the differences between these two moments for some typical exercise conditions. The differences between these these moments are shown to be due to (a) gravitational effects, (b) inertial effects, and (c) non-rigidity of the Cybex arm/shank-foot system. The results obtained suggest that the moments recorded using the dynamometer should not be used to derive muscle properties without taking into account the relationship between the resultant joint moments and the moments measured using an isokinetic dynamometer.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Review on Evaluation Strategies for Field Assessment of Upper-Body Industrial Exoskeletons: Current Practices and Future Trends.

Kuber P, Abdollahi M, Alemi M, Rashedi E Ann Biomed Eng. 2022; 50(10):1203-1231.

PMID: 35916980 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-03003-1.


Ankle joint rotation and exerted moment during plantarflexion dependents on measuring- and fixation method.

Stafilidis S, Kopper-Zisser C PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0253015.

PMID: 34464390 PMC: 8407569. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253015.


Anterior subject positioning affects the maximal exerted isometric plantar flexion moment.

Stafilidis S, Sickinger C PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219840.

PMID: 31329607 PMC: 6645493. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219840.


Robot-assisted assessment of muscle strength.

Toigo M, Fluck M, Riener R, Klamroth-Marganska V J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017; 14(1):103.

PMID: 29020968 PMC: 5637351. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0314-2.


Bilateral Strength Deficit Is Not Neural in Origin; Rather Due to Dynamometer Mechanical Configuration.

Simoneau-Buessinger E, Leteneur S, Toumi A, Dessurne A, Gabrielli F, Barbier F PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0145077.

PMID: 26684828 PMC: 4684274. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145077.