» Articles » PMID: 33384446

Swedish Intrauterine Growth Reference Ranges of Biometric Measurements of Fetal Head, Abdomen and Femur

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Jan 1
PMID 33384446
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ultrasonic assessment of fetal growth is an important part of obstetric care to prevent adverse pregnancy outcome. However, lack of reliable reference ranges is a major barrier for accurate interpretation of the examinations. The aim of this study was to create updated Swedish national reference ranges for intrauterine size and growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur from gestational week 12 to 42. This prospective longitudinal multicentre study included 583 healthy pregnant women with low risk of aberrant fetal growth. Each woman was examined up to five times with ultrasound from gestational week 12 + 3 to 41 + 6. The assessed intrauterine fetal biometric measurements were biparietal diameter (outer-inner), head circumference, mean abdominal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length. A two-level hierarchical regression model was employed to account for the individual measurements of the fetus and the number of repeated visits for measurements while accounting for the random effect of the identified parameterization of gestational age. The expected median and variance, expressed in both standard deviations and percentiles, for each individual biometric measurement was calculated. The presented national reference ranges can be used for assessment of intrauterine size and growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.

Citing Articles

Targeted newborn metabolomics: prediction of gestational age from cord blood.

Jasper E, Oltman S, Rogers E, Dagle J, Murray J, Kamya M J Perinatol. 2022; 42(2):181-186.

PMID: 35067676 PMC: 8830770. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01253-w.


Swedish intrauterine growth reference ranges for estimated fetal weight.

Lindstrom L, Ageheim M, Axelsson O, Hussain-Alkhateeb L, Skalkidou A, Wikstrom A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):12464.

PMID: 34127756 PMC: 8203766. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92032-2.

References
1.
Sletner L, Kiserud T, Vangen S, Nakstad B, Jenum A . Effects of applying universal fetal growth standards in a Scandinavian multi-ethnic population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 97(2):168-179. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13269. View

2.
Heude B, Guern M, Forhan A, Scherdel P, Kadawathagedara M, Dufourg M . Are selection criteria for healthy pregnancies responsible for the gap between fetal growth in the French national Elfe birth cohort and the Intergrowth-21st fetal growth standards?. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018; 33(1):47-56. DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12526. View

3.
Nicolaides K, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Wright A, Akolekar R . Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52(1):44-51. DOI: 10.1002/uog.19073. View

4.
Skalkidou A, Kullinger M, Georgakis M, Kieler H, Kesmodel U . Systematic misclassification of gestational age by ultrasound biometry: implications for clinical practice and research methodology in the Nordic countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018; 97(4):440-444. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13300. View

5.
Kierans W, Joseph K, Luo Z, Platt R, Wilkins R, Kramer M . Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008; 8:1. PMC: 2266898. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-1. View