» Articles » PMID: 15229915

Ultrasound Dating at 12-14 or 15-20 Weeks of Gestation? A Prospective Cross-validation of Established Dating Formulae in a Population of In-vitro Fertilized Pregnancies Randomized to Early or Late Dating Scan

Overview
Date 2004 Jul 2
PMID 15229915
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine the accuracy of established ultrasound dating formulae when used at 12-14 and 15-20 gestational weeks.

Methods: A total of 363 singleton pregnancies conceived after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and randomized to a dating scan at 12-14 or 15-20 gestational weeks were studied. 'True' gestational age was calculated on the basis of the day of oocyte retrieval and was compared to gestational age calculated on the basis of seven dating formulae including the fetal biparietal diameter (BPD) and three dating formulae including BPD and fetal femur length (FL). The mean of the differences between estimated and true gestational age (systematic measurement error) and their SD (random measurement error) were calculated for each formula.

Results: Three formulae showed systematic errors of less than -0.7 days at both early and late scanning. Two formulae overestimated gestational age at both early and late scanning by 5.7 and 3.1 vs. 2.3 and 2.8 days, respectively, while five formulae manifested very different systematic errors at early and late scanning. The formulae used for clinical management underestimated gestational age by a mean of 3 days when dating was performed at 12-14 weeks, and by a mean of 0.8 days when dating was done at 15-20 weeks. The random error was on average 1 day less when the scan was carried out early (2 vs. 3 days; P < 0.0005). Mean true gestational age at delivery in IVF pregnancies with spontaneous start of labor was 279 days (SD 12.9); excluding preterm deliveries it was 281 days (SD 8.1).

Conclusions: Ultrasound dating formulae originally intended for use in the middle of the second trimester do not necessarily perform well when used for dating earlier in gestation. The systematic and random error of any dating formula must be assessed for the gestational age interval in which the formula is intended to be used.

Citing Articles

Association between miRNAs in serum at 10-14 gestational weeks and spontaneous preterm delivery.

Wikstrom T, Kim S, Leverin A, Wennerholm U, Jacobsson B, Valentin L Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024; 103(10):2013-2023.

PMID: 39034527 PMC: 11426222. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14926.


Relation between perinatal outcome and gestational duration in term primiparous pregnancies stratified by body mass index.

Lindegren L, Stuart A, Herbst A, Kallen K Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022; 101(12):1414-1421.

PMID: 36168197 PMC: 9812063. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14465.


Microbial and human transcriptome in vaginal fluid at midgestation: Association with spontaneous preterm delivery.

Wikstrom T, Abrahamsson S, Bengtsson-Palme J, Ek J, Kuusela P, Rekabdar E Clin Transl Med. 2022; 12(9):e1023.

PMID: 36103557 PMC: 9473488. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.1023.


Clinical implications of first-trimester ultrasound dating in singleton pregnancies obtained through in vitro fertilization.

Rapisarda A, Somigliana E, Dallagiovanna C, Reschini M, Pezone M, Accurti V PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272447.

PMID: 36001604 PMC: 9401168. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272447.


Cost-effectiveness of cervical length screening and progesterone treatment to prevent spontaneous preterm delivery in Sweden.

Wikstrom T, Kuusela P, Jacobsson B, Hagberg H, Lindgren P, Svensson M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 59(6):778-792.

PMID: 35195310 PMC: 9327505. DOI: 10.1002/uog.24884.