» Articles » PMID: 33384377

Evolution of Fold Switching in a Metamorphic Protein

Overview
Journal Science
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Jan 1
PMID 33384377
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Metamorphic proteins switch between different folds, defying the protein folding paradigm. It is unclear how fold switching arises during evolution. With ancestral reconstruction and nuclear magnetic resonance, we studied the evolution of the metamorphic human protein XCL1, which has two distinct folds with different functions, making it an unusual member of the chemokine family, whose members generally adopt one conserved fold. XCL1 evolved from an ancestor with the chemokine fold. Evolution of a dimer interface, changes in structural constraints and molecular strain, and alteration of intramolecular protein contacts drove the evolution of metamorphosis. Then, XCL1 likely evolved to preferentially populate the noncanonical fold before reaching its modern-day near-equal population of folds. These discoveries illuminate how one sequence has evolved to encode multiple structures, revealing principles for protein design and engineering.

Citing Articles

Sequence clustering confounds AlphaFold2.

Schafer J, Lee M, Chakravarty D, Thole J, Chen E, Porter L Nature. 2025; 638(8051):E8-E12.

PMID: 39972235 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08267-2.


From duplication to fusion: Expanding Dayhoff's model of protein evolution.

Muthahari Y, Magnus L, Laurino P Protein Sci. 2025; 34(3):e70054.

PMID: 39969106 PMC: 11837038. DOI: 10.1002/pro.70054.


The multifaceted role of XCL1 in health and disease.

Syed M, Dishman A, Volkman B, Walker T Protein Sci. 2025; 34(2):e70032.

PMID: 39840812 PMC: 11751857. DOI: 10.1002/pro.70032.


AlphaFold2's training set powers its predictions of fold-switched conformations.

Schafer J, Porter L bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39803493 PMC: 11722258. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.11.617857.


Proteins with alternative folds reveal blind spots in AlphaFold-based protein structure prediction.

Chakravarty D, Lee M, Porter L ArXiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39801626 PMC: 11722503.


References
1.
Nguyen L, Vogel H . Structural perspectives on antimicrobial chemokines. Front Immunol. 2013; 3:384. PMC: 3531597. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00384. View

2.
Langan R, Boyken S, Ng A, Samson J, Dods G, Westbrook A . De novo design of bioactive protein switches. Nature. 2019; 572(7768):205-210. PMC: 6733528. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1432-8. View

3.
Tuinstra R, Peterson F, Kutlesa S, Elgin E, Kron M, Volkman B . Interconversion between two unrelated protein folds in the lymphotactin native state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(13):5057-62. PMC: 2278211. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0709518105. View

4.
Flock T, Hauser A, Lund N, Gloriam D, Balaji S, Babu M . Selectivity determinants of GPCR-G-protein binding. Nature. 2017; 545(7654):317-322. PMC: 5846738. DOI: 10.1038/nature22070. View

5.
Farrow N, Zhang O, Forman-Kay J, Kay L . A heteronuclear correlation experiment for simultaneous determination of 15N longitudinal decay and chemical exchange rates of systems in slow equilibrium. J Biomol NMR. 1994; 4(5):727-34. DOI: 10.1007/BF00404280. View