» Articles » PMID: 33382702

Ash1 and Tup1 Dependent Repression of the Saccharomyces Cerevisiae HO Promoter Requires Activator-dependent Nucleosome Eviction

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2020 Dec 31
PMID 33382702
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transcriptional regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO gene is highly complex, requiring a balance of multiple activating and repressing factors to ensure that only a few transcripts are produced in mother cells within a narrow window of the cell cycle. Here, we show that the Ash1 repressor associates with two DNA sequences that are usually concealed within nucleosomes in the HO promoter and recruits the Tup1 corepressor and the Rpd3 histone deacetylase, both of which are required for full repression in daughters. Genome-wide ChIP identified greater than 200 additional sites of co-localization of these factors, primarily within large, intergenic regions from which they could regulate adjacent genes. Most Ash1 binding sites are in nucleosome depleted regions (NDRs), while a small number overlap nucleosomes, similar to HO. We demonstrate that Ash1 binding to the HO promoter does not occur in the absence of the Swi5 transcription factor, which recruits coactivators that evict nucleosomes, including the nucleosomes obscuring the Ash1 binding sites. In the absence of Swi5, artificial nucleosome depletion allowed Ash1 to bind, demonstrating that nucleosomes are inhibitory to Ash1 binding. The location of binding sites within nucleosomes may therefore be a mechanism for limiting repressive activity to periods of nucleosome eviction that are otherwise associated with activation of the promoter. Our results illustrate that activation and repression can be intricately connected, and events set in motion by an activator may also ensure the appropriate level of repression and reset the promoter for the next activation cycle.

Citing Articles

Systematic analysis of tup1 and cyc8 mutants reveals distinct roles for TUP1 and CYC8 and offers new insight into the regulation of gene transcription by the yeast Tup1-Cyc8 complex.

Lee B, Church M, Hokamp K, Alhussain M, Bamagoos A, Fleming A PLoS Genet. 2023; 19(8):e1010876.

PMID: 37566621 PMC: 10446238. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010876.


Structures and consequences of pioneer factor binding to nucleosomes.

Luzete-Monteiro E, Zaret K Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2022; 75:102425.

PMID: 35863165 PMC: 9976633. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102425.


Genetic analysis argues for a coactivator function for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tup1 corepressor.

Parnell E, Parnell T, Stillman D Genetics. 2021; 219(2).

PMID: 34849878 PMC: 8633128. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab120.

References
1.
Cosma M . Ordered recruitment: gene-specific mechanism of transcription activation. Mol Cell. 2002; 10(2):227-36. DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00604-4. View

2.
Green S, Johnson A . Promoter-dependent roles for the Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase and the Hda1 deacetylase in Tup1-mediated repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2004; 15(9):4191-202. PMC: 515351. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e04-05-0412. View

3.
Smith R, Johnson A . Turning genes off by Ssn6-Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000; 25(7):325-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01592-9. View

4.
Cosma M, Tanaka T, Nasmyth K . Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter. Cell. 1999; 97(3):299-311. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80740-0. View

5.
Kadosh D, Struhl K . Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell. 1997; 89(3):365-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80217-2. View