» Articles » PMID: 33363089

Patient Preferences For Specialty Pharmacy Services: A Stated Preference Discrete-Choice Experiment in China

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Dec 28
PMID 33363089
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To survey, analyze, and ascertain the preferences for specialty pharmacy services among patients requiring complex care and to provide evidence to support specialty pharmacy service decision-making in China. To identify essential service attributes and levels, a review of the literature, discussions with specialty pharmacy managers and a pilot questionnaire were conducted. A D-efficient fractional factorial design was used to generate the discrete-choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire. A face-to-face survey of patients with chronic illness and their families or friends was conducted at three specialty pharmacies in Chengdu and Qingdao, China. A mixed logit model was used for estimation. Six relevant attributes were identified and incorporated into the DCE questionnaire. A total of 417 participants completed the survey (mean age 43 years, 45.1% males), and 32.1% had lung cancer. The conditional relative importance showed that the most critical attribute was "frequency of telephone follow-up to monitor adverse drug reactions (ADRs), "followed by "mode of drug delivery," "provider of medication guidance services," and "availability of medical insurance consultation"; the least important attribute was "business hours." A 1 min increase in time spent led to a 0.73% decrease in the probability that a service profile would be chosen. Negative preferences were noted for ADR monitoring by telephone follow-up once a year (β = -0.23, < 0.001) and business hours [8:30-20:00 (Monday to Friday), 8:30-17:30 (weekend)] (β = -0.12, < 0.001). Compared with women, men had a higher preference for service monitoring ADRs once every 3 months. Preference measurements showed that "frequency of telephone follow-up to monitor ADRs" had the most critical impact on decisions, followed by "mode of drug delivery." Specialty pharmacies in China need to take these findings into account to improve their design to increase uptake and patient loyalty.

Citing Articles

Residents Preferences for Pharmacist-Managed Clinic in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Sun Q, Wang Y, Wang P, Huang Y, Xi X Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:1409-1422.

PMID: 38978750 PMC: 11228533. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S457655.


Preferences for Physical Examination Service in Community Health Service Center in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Sun H, Li F, Xu Y, Qi Q, Du Y Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:39-51.

PMID: 38204759 PMC: 10778187. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S440896.


Patient Preferences for Pharmacy Services: A Systematic Review of Studies Based on Discrete Choice Experiments.

Riboulet M, Clairet A, Bennani M, Nerich V Patient. 2023; 17(1):13-24.

PMID: 38093090 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00652-9.


Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®).

Costa S, Guerreiro J, Teixeira I, Helling D, Mateus C, Pereira J PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0292308.

PMID: 37796918 PMC: 10553278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292308.

References
1.
Hauber A, Gonzalez J, Groothuis-Oudshoorn C, Prior T, Marshall D, Cunningham C . Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016; 19(4):300-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. View

2.
Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob E, Ellis A, Vass C . Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018; 37(2):201-226. PMC: 6386055. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2. View

3.
Bridges J, Hauber A, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser L, Regier D . Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011; 14(4):403-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. View

4.
Lancsar E, Louviere J . Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?. Health Econ. 2006; 15(8):797-811. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1104. View

5.
Poulos C, Soliman A, Renz C, Posner J, Agarwal S . Patient Preferences for Endometriosis Pain Treatments in the United States. Value Health. 2019; 22(6):728-738. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.12.010. View