» Articles » PMID: 33324431

Expression of Putative Defense Responses in Cannabis Primed by And/or Strains and Infected by

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2020 Dec 16
PMID 33324431
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cannabis ( L.) offers many industrial, agricultural, and medicinal applications, but is commonly threatened by the gray mold disease caused by the fungus . With few effective control measures currently available, the use of beneficial rhizobacteria represents a promising biocontrol avenue for cannabis. To counter disease development, plants rely on a complex network of inducible defense pathways, allowing them to respond locally and systemically to pathogens attacks. In this study, we present the first attempt to control gray mold in cannabis using beneficial rhizobacteria, and the first investigation of cannabis defense responses at the molecular level. Four promising (LBUM223 and WCS417r) and strains (LBUM279 and LBUM979) were applied as single or combined root treatments to cannabis seedlings, which were subsequently infected by Symptoms were recorded and the expression of eight putative defense genes was monitored in leaves by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The rhizobacteria did not significantly control gray mold and all infected leaves were necrotic after a week, regardless of the treatment. Similarly, no systemic activation of putative cannabis defense genes was reported, neither triggered by the pathogen nor by the rhizobacteria. However, this work identified five putative defense genes (, , , , and ) that were strongly and sustainably induced locally at 's infection sites, as well as two stably expressed reference genes ( and ) in cannabis. These markers will be useful in future researches exploring cannabis defense pathways.

Citing Articles

Mechanisms of Cannabis Growth Promotion by S141.

Aunkam P, Sibponkrung S, Limkul S, Seabkongseng T, Mahanil K, Umnajkitikorn K Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39519890 PMC: 11547760. DOI: 10.3390/plants13212971.


Taxonomy of spp. determines interactions with .

Lyng M, Borisdottir B, Sveinsdottir S, Hansen M, Jelsbak L, Maroti G mSystems. 2024; 9(10):e0021224.

PMID: 39254334 PMC: 11494997. DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00212-24.


Integrated Management of Pathogens and Microbes in L. (Cannabis) under Greenhouse Conditions.

Buirs L, Punja Z Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38592798 PMC: 10974757. DOI: 10.3390/plants13060786.


Assessing the adaptive role of cannabidiol (CBD) in defense against cannabis aphids.

MacWilliams J, Peirce E, Pitt W, Schreiner M, Matthews T, Yao L Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1223894.

PMID: 37915508 PMC: 10616793. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1223894.


Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Potential Pathogen Resistance in .

Sirangelo T, Ludlow R, Spadafora N Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(15).

PMID: 37570918 PMC: 10420965. DOI: 10.3390/plants12152764.


References
1.
Jain A, Singh A, Singh S, Sarma B, Singh H . Biocontrol agents-mediated suppression of oxalic acid induced cell death during Sclerotinia sclerotiorum-pea interaction. J Basic Microbiol. 2014; 55(5):601-6. DOI: 10.1002/jobm.201400156. View

2.
Ahmad Ansari F, Ahmad I . Fluorescent Pseudomonas -FAP2 and Bacillus licheniformis interact positively in biofilm mode enhancing plant growth and photosynthetic attributes. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):4547. PMC: 6418123. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40864-4. View

3.
Dean R, van Kan J, Pretorius Z, Hammond-Kosack K, Di Pietro A, Spanu P . The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012; 13(4):414-30. PMC: 6638784. DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x. View

4.
Backer R, Naidoo S, van den Berg N . The NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES 1 (NPR1) and Related Family: Mechanistic Insights in Plant Disease Resistance. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:102. PMC: 6381062. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00102. View

5.
Guo R, Guo H, Zhang Q, Guo M, Xu Y, Zeng M . Evaluation of reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis in wild and cultivated Cannabis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2018; 82(11):1902-1910. DOI: 10.1080/09168451.2018.1506253. View