» Articles » PMID: 19184461

Transcript Profiling of Oilseed Rape (Brassica Napus) Primed for Biocontrol Differentiate Genes Involved in Microbial Interactions with Beneficial Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens from Pathogenic Botrytis Cinerea

Overview
Journal Plant Mol Biol
Date 2009 Feb 3
PMID 19184461
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many microorganisms interact with plants but information is insufficient concerning requirements for plant colonization and if interactions become beneficial or detrimental. Pretreatment of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) with Bacillus results in disease suppression upon challenge with pathogens. We have studied transcriptome effects on oilseed rape primed with the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 5113 biocontrol strain and compared that with effects of the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Using the cDNA-AFLP technique 21,700 transcript fragments were obtained of which 120 were differentially expressed and verified by northern blot analysis for selected transcripts. Priming with Bacillus caused greater effect on leaf than root transcripts where sequencing and BLAST analysis suggested many of the transcripts to be involved in metabolism and bioenergy. Bacillus and Botrytis treatment also changed metabolic gene expression in addition to signaling and transcription control genes as well as a potential disease resistance (TIR-NBS-LRR) gene. The pathogen provoked non-primed plant profile was less dominated by metabolism than Bacillus and Bacillus-Botrytis treated plants. Several transcripts were homologues to unknown genes in the different treatments. Altogether Bacillus treatment of roots cause a systemic gene expression in leaves suggested to result in a metabolic reprogramming as a major event during priming.

Citing Articles

Halotolerant bacterial endophyte s CBE mediates abiotic stress tolerance with minimal transcriptional modifications in .

Abd El-Daim I, Raynes G, Fernandez-Fuentes N, Hawkins S, Cookson A, Farrar K Front Plant Sci. 2025; 15:1485391.

PMID: 39866317 PMC: 11757260. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1485391.


Plant defense compounds can enhance antagonistic effects against of seed-associated fungi isolated from wild Brassicaceae.

Lerenard T, Aligon S, Berruyer R, Poupard P, Le Corff J Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1466043.

PMID: 39403623 PMC: 11472831. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1466043.


Tissue-Specific Hormone Signalling and Defence Gene Induction in an In Vitro Assembly of the Rapeseed Pathosystem.

Hafiz F, Geistlinger J, Al Mamun A, Schellenberg I, Neumann G, Rozhon W Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(13).

PMID: 37445666 PMC: 10341851. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310489.


SN16-1-Induced Resistance System of the Tomato against .

Zhao H, Wang X, Wang W Pathogens. 2022; 11(1).

PMID: 35055983 PMC: 8780726. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11010035.


Phytostimulation and biocontrol potential of Gram-positive endospore-forming Bacilli.

Soni R, Keharia H Planta. 2021; 254(3):49.

PMID: 34383174 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-021-03695-0.


References
1.
Uknes S, Mauch-Mani B, Moyer M, Potter S, Williams S, Dincher S . Acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1992; 4(6):645-56. PMC: 160161. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.4.6.645. View

2.
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M . AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23(21):4407-14. PMC: 307397. DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407. View

3.
Yan Z, Reddy M, Ryu C, McInroy J, Wilson M, Kloepper J . Induced systemic protection against tomato late blight elicited by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology. 2008; 92(12):1329-33. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.12.1329. View

4.
Pozo M, van der Ent S, van Loon L, Pieterse C . Transcription factor MYC2 is involved in priming for enhanced defense during rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2008; 180(2):511-523. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02578.x. View

5.
Ryu C, Murphy J, Mysore K, Kloepper J . Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria systemically protect Arabidopsis thaliana against Cucumber mosaic virus by a salicylic acid and NPR1-independent and jasmonic acid-dependent signaling pathway. Plant J. 2004; 39(3):381-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02142.x. View