» Articles » PMID: 33322352

Portable Oxygen Therapy: Is the 6-Minute Walking Test Overestimating the Actual Oxygen Needs?

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Dec 16
PMID 33322352
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The appropriate titration for the personalized oxygen needs of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and severe hypoxemia is a determining factor in the success of long-term oxygen therapy. There are no standardized procedures to assist in determining the patient's needs during the physical activities of daily life. Despite that effort tests are a wide broad approach, further research concerning the development of protocols to titrate O therapy is needed. The main objective of this study was to assess whether the level of oxygen titrated through the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) for patients with COPD and exertional hypoxemia is adequate to meet the patients' demand during their activities of daily living. Physiological and subjective variables were estimated for a study population during two walking tests: a 6MWT and a 20-minute walking circuit (20MWC), designed ad-hoc to reproduce daily physical activities more truthfully. The results indicate that in a significant proportion of patients, the 6MWT might not accurately predict their oxygen needs at a domiciliary environment. Therefore, the titration of the portable O therapy could not be optimal in these cases, with the detrimental impact on the patient's health (hyperoxia episodes), the autonomy of the oxygen device, and the decrease of time out of the home.

Citing Articles

Telemonitoring of daily activities compared to the six-minute walk test further completes the puzzle of oximetry-guided interventions.

Santos C, Santos A, das Neves R, Ribeiro R, Rodrigues F, Caneiras C Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):16600.

PMID: 34400715 PMC: 8367992. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96060-w.


Patient-centered Outcomes Research in Interstitial Lung Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

Aronson K, Danoff S, Russell A, Ryerson C, Suzuki A, Wijsenbeek M Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021; 204(2):e3-e23.

PMID: 34283696 PMC: 8650796. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202105-1193ST.

References
1.
Magnet F, Schwarz S, Callegari J, Criee C, Storre J, Windisch W . Long-Term Oxygen Therapy: Comparison of the German and British Guidelines. Respiration. 2017; 93(4):253-263. DOI: 10.1159/000455879. View

2.
Khor Y, Renzoni E, Visca D, McDonald C, Goh N . Oxygen therapy in COPD and interstitial lung disease: navigating the knowns and unknowns. ERJ Open Res. 2019; 5(3). PMC: 6745413. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00118-2019. View

3.
Mayoralas-Alises S, Carratala J, Diaz-Lobato S . New Perspectives in Oxygen Therapy Titration: Is Automatic Titration the Future?. Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2018; 55(6):319-327. DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2018.09.006. View

4.
Borg G . Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 14(5):377-81. View

5.
Szczegielniak J, Latawiec K, Luniewski J, Stanislawski R, Bogacz K, Krajczy M . A study on nonlinear estimation of submaximal effort tolerance based on the generalized MET concept and the 6MWT in pulmonary rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0191875. PMC: 5806867. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191875. View