» Articles » PMID: 33314265

Acoustic Pharyngometry - A New Method to Facilitate Oral Appliance Therapy

Overview
Journal J Oral Rehabil
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Dec 14
PMID 33314265
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is lack of reliable and accurate methods to predict treatment outcomes of oral appliance (OA) treatment. Acoustic pharyngometry (AP) is a non-invasive technique to evaluate the volume and minimal cross-sectional area of the upper airway, which may prove useful to locate the optimal position of OAs.

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of applying AP to OA treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).

Methods: All patients (n = 244) treated with OAs following an AP protocol at two dental clinics between 2013 and 2018 were invited to participate. A total of 129 patients accepted the invitation, and 120 patients (75 men, 45 women) were included in the analyses. Mean baseline age, BMI and apnoea hypopnea index (AHI) were 59.1 ± 0.9 years, 27.8 ± 0.4 and 21.9 ± 1.1, respectively. Mean follow-up time was 318 ± 24 days.

Results: AHI at follow-up was 6.4 ± 0.7, resulting in a treatment success rate of 86.7% (≥50% reduction of baseline AHI). The number of failures (<50% reduction of baseline AHI) did not differ significantly among patients with mild, moderate and severe OSA. 87.6% of the patients reported OA usage every night, and 95.5% reported > 5 hours usage per night, when worn.

Conclusion: The AP protocol applied seems to contribute to the excellent effect of OA treatment in this study. Further research on the application of AP in OA treatment is necessary in order to clarify its possible beneficial contribution to improving OA therapy.

Citing Articles

Oropharyngeal geometry and acoustic parameters of voice in healthy and Parkinson's disease subjects.

Silva J, Gomes A, Coriolano M, Teixeira J, Lima H, Paulino C Codas. 2023; 35(2):e20210304.

PMID: 37075413 PMC: 10137768. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232021304pt.


Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of customized maxillary oral appliance with mandibular advancement appliance as a treatment modality for moderate obstructive sleep apnea patients-protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Belkhode V, Godbole S, Nimonkar S, Nimonkar P, Pisulkar S Trials. 2022; 23(1):159.

PMID: 35172870 PMC: 8848661. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06070-w.


Acoustic pharyngometry - A new method to facilitate oral appliance therapy.

Opsahl U, Berge M, Lehmann S, Bjorvatn B, Opsahl P, Johansson A J Oral Rehabil. 2020; 48(5):601-613.

PMID: 33314265 PMC: 8246767. DOI: 10.1111/joor.13134.

References
1.
Brown I, Zamel N, Hoffstein V . Pharyngeal cross-sectional area in normal men and women. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986; 61(3):890-5. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1986.61.3.890. View

2.
Sutherland K, Chan A, Ngiam J, Dalci O, Darendeliler M, Cistulli P . Awake Multimodal Phenotyping for Prediction of Oral Appliance Treatment Outcome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018; 14(11):1879-1887. PMC: 6223562. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.7484. View

3.
Fritsch K, Iseli A, Russi E, Bloch K . Side effects of mandibular advancement devices for sleep apnea treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 164(5):813-8. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2003078. View

4.
Bartolucci M, Bortolotti F, Raffaelli E, DAnto V, Michelotti A, Bonetti G . The effectiveness of different mandibular advancement amounts in OSA patients: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Sleep Breath. 2016; 20(3):911-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11325-015-1307-7. View

5.
Marshall I, Maran N, Martin S, Jan M, Rimmington J, Best J . Acoustic reflectometry for airway measurements in man: implementation and validation. Physiol Meas. 1993; 14(2):157-69. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/14/2/007. View