» Articles » PMID: 33304516

Biogeographic Differences in Plant-soil Biota Relationships Contribute to the Exotic Range Expansion of

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2020 Dec 11
PMID 33304516
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Exotic plant species can evolve adaptations to environmental conditions in the exotic range. Furthermore, soil biota can foster exotic spread in the absence of negative soil pathogen-plant interactions or because of increased positive soil biota-plant feedbacks in the exotic range. Little is known, however, about the evolutionary dimension of plant-soil biota interactions when comparing native and introduced ranges.To assess the role of soil microbes for rapid evolution in plant invasion, we subjected , a species native to Europe, to a reciprocal transplant experiment with soil and seed material originating from Germany (native) and New Zealand (exotic). Soil samples were treated with biocides to distinguish between effects of soil fungi and bacteria. Seedlings from each of five native and exotic populations were transplanted into soil biota communities originating from all populations and subjected to treatments of soil biota reduction: application of (a) fungicide, (b) biocide, (c) a combination of the two, and (d) control.For most of the investigated traits, native populations showed higher performance than exotic populations; there was no effect of soil biota origin. However, plants developed longer leaves and larger rosettes when treated with their respective home soil communities, indicating that native and exotic plant populations differed in their interaction with soil biota origin. The absence of fungi and bacteria resulted in a higher specific root length, suggesting that may compensate the absence of mutualistic microbes by increasing its root-soil surface contact. Introduced plants can evolve adaptations to soil biota in their new distribution range. This demonstrates the importance of biogeographic differences in plant-soil biota relationships and suggests that future studies addressing evolutionary divergence should account for differential effects of soil biota from the home and exotic range on native and exotic populations of successful plant invaders.

Citing Articles

Introduced species shed friends as well as enemies.

Xirocostas Z, Ollerton J, Peco B, Slavich E, Bonser S, Partel M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11088.

PMID: 38750079 PMC: 11096385. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61788-8.


Alternative Crops for the European Tobacco Industry: A Systematic Review.

Mavroeidis A, Stavropoulos P, Papadopoulos G, Tsela A, Roussis I, Kakabouki I Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38256796 PMC: 10818552. DOI: 10.3390/plants13020236.


Biogeographic differences in plant-soil biota relationships contribute to the exotic range expansion of .

Dieskau J, Bruelheide H, Gutknecht J, Erfmeier A Ecol Evol. 2020; 10(23):13057-13070.

PMID: 33304516 PMC: 7713913. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6894.


Combined Effects of UV-B and Drought on Native and Exotic Populations of L.

Hock M, Plos C, Sporbert M, Erfmeier A Plants (Basel). 2020; 9(2).

PMID: 32085564 PMC: 7076424. DOI: 10.3390/plants9020269.

References
1.
Packer A, Clay K . Soil pathogens and spatial patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree. Nature. 2000; 404(6775):278-81. DOI: 10.1038/35005072. View

2.
Callaway R, Bedmar E, Reinhart K, Silvan C, Klironomos J . Effects of soil biota from different ranges on Robinia invasion: acquiring mutualists and escaping pathogens. Ecology. 2011; 92(5):1027-35. DOI: 10.1890/10-0089.1. View

3.
Reinhart K, Callaway R . Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytol. 2006; 170(3):445-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01715.x. View

4.
Dickie I, Bolstridge N, Cooper J, Peltzer D . Co-invasion by Pinus and its mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2010; 187(2):475-484. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03277.x. View

5.
Schrieber K, Lachmuth S . The Genetic Paradox of Invasions revisited: the potential role of inbreeding × environment interactions in invasion success. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016; 92(2):939-952. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12263. View