Hydroxyapatite Formation on Coated Titanium Implants Submerged in Simulated Body Fluid

Overview

Journal Materials (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Date 2020 Dec 11

PMID 33302431

Citations 4

Authors

Tatiana Aviles

Shu-Min Hsu

Arthur Clark

Fan Ren

Chaker Fares

Patrick H Carey 4th

Josephine F Esquivel-Upshaw

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Titanium implants are commonly used in the field of dentistry for prosthetics such as crowns, bridges, and dentures. For successful therapy, an implant must bind to the surrounding bone in a process known as osseointegration. The objective for this ongoing study is to determine the potential of different implant surface coatings in providing the formation of hydroxyapatite (HA). The coatings include titanium nitride (TiN), silicon dioxide (SiO), and quaternized titanium nitride (QTiN). The controls were a sodium hydroxide treated group, which functioned as a positive control, and an uncoated titanium group. Each coated disc was submerged in simulated body fluid (SBF), replenished every 48 h, over a period of 28 days. Each coating successfully developed a layer of HA, which was calculated through mass comparisons and observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive analysis x-rays (EDX). Among these coatings, the quaternized titanium nitride coating seemed to have a better yield of HA. Further studies to expand the data concerning this experiment are underway.

Citing Articles

Precise surface engineering: Leveraging chemical vapor deposition for enhanced biocompatibility and durability in biomedical implants.

Saba T, Saad K, Rashid A Heliyon. 2024; 10(18):e37976.

PMID: 39328539 PMC: 11425162. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37976.

Freeze casting of hydroxyapatite-titania composites for bone substitutes.

Yin T, Steyl S, Howard J, Carlson K, Jeyapalina S, Naleway S J Biomed Mater Res A. 2023; 112(3):473-483.

PMID: 37962005 PMC: 11822889. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37645.

Customized Additive Manufacturing in Bone Scaffolds-The Gateway to Precise Bone Defect Treatment.

Zhou J, See C, Sreenivasamurthy S, Zhu D Research (Wash D C). 2023; 6:0239.

PMID: 37818034 PMC: 10561823. DOI: 10.34133/research.0239.

A Review on Biomaterials for Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology: From Past to Present.

Szczesny G, Kopec M, Politis D, Kowalewski Z, Lazarski A, Szolc T Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(10).

PMID: 35629649 PMC: 9145924. DOI: 10.3390/ma15103622.

Endosseous Dental Implant Materials and Clinical Outcomes of Different Alloys: A Systematic Review.

Fiorillo L, Cicciu M, Tozum T, Saccucci M, Orlando C, Romano G Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(5).

PMID: 35269211 PMC: 8911578. DOI: 10.3390/ma15051979.

References

Barthes J, Cazzola M, Muller C, Dollinger C, Debry C, Ferraris S . Controlling porous titanium/soft tissue interactions with an innovative surface chemical treatment: Responses of macrophages and fibroblasts. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020; 112:110845. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110845. View

Hsu S, Ren F, Chen Z, Kim M, Fares C, Clark A . Novel Coating to Minimize Corrosion of Glass-Ceramics for Dental Applications. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(5). PMC: 7085065. DOI: 10.3390/ma13051215. View

Romero-Gavilan F, Araujo-Gomes N, Sanchez-Perez A, Garcia-Arnaez I, Elortza F, Azkargorta M . Bioactive potential of silica coatings and its effect on the adhesion of proteins to titanium implants. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017; 162:316-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.11.072. View

Bordea I, Candrea S, Alexescu G, Bran S, Baciut M, Baciut G . Nano-hydroxyapatite use in dentistry: a systematic review. Drug Metab Rev. 2020; 52(2):319-332. DOI: 10.1080/03602532.2020.1758713. View

Kokubo T, Takadama H . How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?. Biomaterials. 2006; 27(15):2907-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017. View

Masuda T, Salvi G, Offenbacher S, Felton D, Cooper L . Cell and matrix reactions at titanium implants in surgically prepared rat tibiae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12(4):472-85. View

Fares C, Hsu S, Xian M, Xia X, Ren F, Mecholsky Jr J . Demonstration of a SiC Protective Coating for Titanium Implants. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(15). PMC: 7435394. DOI: 10.3390/ma13153321. View

Camargo S, Roy T, Carey Iv P, Fares C, Ren F, Clark A . Novel Coatings to Minimize Bacterial Adhesion and Promote Osteoblast Activity for Titanium Implants. J Funct Biomater. 2020; 11(2). PMC: 7353544. DOI: 10.3390/jfb11020042. View

Carey 4th P, Ren F, Jia Z, Batich C, Camargo S, Clark A . Antibacterial Properties of Charged TiN Surfaces for Dental Implant Application. ChemistrySelect. 2020; 4(31):9185-9189. PMC: 7059626. DOI: 10.1002/slct.201901001. View

10.

Nijhuis A, Takemoto S, Nejadnik M, Li Y, Yang X, Ossipov D . Rapid screening of mineralization capacity of biomaterials by means of quantification of enzymatically deposited calcium phosphate. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2014; 20(10):838-50. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2013.0334. View

11.

Carrado A, Perrin-Schmitt F, Le Q, Giraudel M, Fischer C, Koenig G . Nanoporous hydroxyapatite/sodium titanate bilayer on titanium implants for improved osteointegration. Dent Mater. 2017; 33(3):321-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.12.013. View

12.

Jemat A, Ghazali M, Razali M, Otsuka Y . Surface Modifications and Their Effects on Titanium Dental Implants. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:791725. PMC: 4575991. DOI: 10.1155/2015/791725. View

13.

Ha S, Lin Jang H, Nam K, Beck Jr G . Nano-hydroxyapatite modulates osteoblast lineage commitment by stimulation of DNA methylation and regulation of gene expression. Biomaterials. 2015; 65:32-42. PMC: 4508253. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.06.039. View

14.

Scheel J, Hermann M . Integrated risk assessment of a hydroxyapatite-protein-composite for use in oral care products: a weight-of-evidence case study. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010; 59(2):310-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.11.003. View

15.

Rupp F, Liang L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Scheideler L, Huttig F . Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review. Dent Mater. 2017; 34(1):40-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.007. View

16.

Mate Sanchez de Val J, Calvo-Guirado J, Gomez-Moreno G, Perez-Albacete Martinez C, Mazon P, De Aza P . Influence of hydroxyapatite granule size, porosity, and crystallinity on tissue reaction in vivo. Part A: synthesis, characterization of the materials, and SEM analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 27(11):1331-1338. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12722. View

17.

Velasco-Ortega E, Ortiz-Garcia I, Jimenez-Guerra A, Monsalve-Guil L, Munoz-Guzon F, Perez R . Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(13). PMC: 6651692. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20133267. View

18.

Zhao W, Lemaitre J, Bowen P . A comparative study of simulated body fluids in the presence of proteins. Acta Biomater. 2017; 53:506-514. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.006. View

19.

Ferraris S, Yamaguchi S, Barbani N, Cazzola M, Cristallini C, Miola M . Bioactive materials: In vitro investigation of different mechanisms of hydroxyapatite precipitation. Acta Biomater. 2019; 102:468-480. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.024. View

20.

Lotz E, Berger M, Schwartz Z, Boyan B . Regulation of osteoclasts by osteoblast lineage cells depends on titanium implant surface properties. Acta Biomater. 2018; 68:296-307. PMC: 5803380. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.039. View