» Articles » PMID: 33299976

Integrating Quantitative Assays with Biologically Based Mathematical Modeling for Predictive Oncology

Overview
Journal iScience
Publisher Cell Press
Date 2020 Dec 10
PMID 33299976
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We provide an overview on the use of biological assays to calibrate and initialize mechanism-based models of cancer phenomena. Although artificial intelligence methods currently dominate the landscape in computational oncology, mathematical models that seek to explicitly incorporate biological mechanisms into their formalism are of increasing interest. These models can guide experimental design and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of cancer progression. Historically, these models have included a myriad of parameters that have been difficult to quantify in biologically relevant systems, limiting their practical insights. Recently, however, there has been much interest calibrating biologically based models with the quantitative measurements available from (for example) RNA sequencing, time-resolved microscopy, and imaging. In this contribution, we summarize how a variety of experimental methods quantify tumor characteristics from the molecular to tissue scales and describe how such data can be directly integrated with mechanism-based models to improve predictions of tumor growth and treatment response.

Citing Articles

Modeling tumor dynamics and predicting response to chemo-, targeted-, and immune-therapies in a murine model of pancreatic cancer.

Vishwanath K, Choi H, Gupta M, Zhou R, Sorace A, Yankeelov T bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39803494 PMC: 11722293. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.03.631015.


A global sensitivity analysis of a mechanistic model of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer constrained by in vitro and in vivo imaging data.

Lorenzo G, Jarrett A, Meyer C, DiCarlo J, Virostko J, Quaranta V Eng Comput. 2024; 40(3):1469-1499.

PMID: 39620056 PMC: 11607094. DOI: 10.1007/s00366-023-01873-0.


Biomolecular alterations temporally anticipate microarchitectural modifications of collagen in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Togni L, Furlani M, Belloni A, Riberti N, Giuliani A, Notarstefano V iScience. 2024; 27(7):110303.

PMID: 39040062 PMC: 11261445. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110303.


Simulation of Soluble and Bound VEGF-stimulated in vitro Capillary-like Network Formation on Deformed Substrate.

Chiang H, Chung C PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(7):e1012281.

PMID: 39038038 PMC: 11262697. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012281.


A mathematical model for predicting the spatiotemporal response of breast cancer cells treated with doxorubicin.

Miniere H, Lima E, Lorenzo G, Hormuth 2nd D, Ty S, Brock A Cancer Biol Ther. 2024; 25(1):2321769.

PMID: 38411436 PMC: 11057790. DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2024.2321769.


References
1.
Kam Y, Karperien A, Weidow B, Estrada L, Anderson A, Quaranta V . Nest expansion assay: a cancer systems biology approach to in vitro invasion measurements. BMC Res Notes. 2009; 2:130. PMC: 2716356. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-130. View

2.
Sinha S, Sinha U . Recent advances in breast MRI and MRS. NMR Biomed. 2008; 22(1):3-16. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1270. View

3.
Nguyen L, Cox C, Eirew P, Knapp D, Pellacani D, Kannan N . DNA barcoding reveals diverse growth kinetics of human breast tumour subclones in serially passaged xenografts. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:5871. PMC: 4284657. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6871. View

4.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

5.
Rockne R, Trister A, Jacobs J, Hawkins-Daarud A, Neal M, Hendrickson K . A patient-specific computational model of hypoxia-modulated radiation resistance in glioblastoma using 18F-FMISO-PET. J R Soc Interface. 2014; 12(103). PMC: 4305419. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.1174. View