» Articles » PMID: 33299963

Satisfaction and Functional Outcomes in Unicompartmental Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: Radiographically Matched Cohort Analysis

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 10
PMID 33299963
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methods: One hundred and thirty-five UKAs and 135 TKAs were matched by patient age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification as well as preoperative osteoarthritis severity in medial and lateral tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments (Kellgren-Lawrence grading system). Patient-reported outcome measures for pain, function, activity level, and satisfaction were evaluated at minimum 1-year follow-up via components of the modern Knee Society Score, the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity-level score, and a Likert satisfaction scale.

Results: The patients in the UKA group reported significantly less pain, a higher activity level, and greater satisfaction while performing several functional activities and could walk for a longer amount of time before stopping due to knee discomfort compared with those in the TKA group (p ≤ 0.038). In addition, a greater proportion of patients in the UKA than in the TKA group were "satisfied or very satisfied" with their knee replacement surgery at minimum 1-year follow-up (90% versus 81%; p = 0.043).

Conclusions: With minimum 1-year follow-up, patients who underwent UKA reported significantly higher function, less pain, and a greater level of patient satisfaction than a radiographically and demographically matched TKA cohort.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Comparison of early curative effects of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with total knee arthroplasty and the legacy constrained condylar knee arthroplasty in the treatment of isolated lateral osteoarthritis: a single-center retrospective....

Yu H, Meng J, Xu Y, Xu K, Lin C, Bao J J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):597.

PMID: 39342362 PMC: 11438380. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05076-1.


All-Polyethylene Tibial Component in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Offers Excellent Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes at Short-Term Follow-Up: A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Study.

Bonanzinga T, Adravanti F, Vitale U, Anzillotti G, Iacono F, Marcacci M Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(9).

PMID: 39336492 PMC: 11434418. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60091451.


Conversion of UKA to TKA using identical standard implants-How does it compare to primary UKA, primary TKA and revision TKA?.

Scheele C, Pietschmann M, Wagner T, Muller P Arthroplasty. 2024; 6(1):48.

PMID: 39223613 PMC: 11370294. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00267-x.


A preliminary study on analysis of lower limb energy during walking in the patients with knee replacement.

Zhou H, Zhang Y, Agarwal A, Arnold G, Wang W Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):e27960.

PMID: 38509893 PMC: 10951602. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27960.


Fixed lateral unicompartmental knee replacement is a reliable treatment for lateral compartment osteoarthritis after mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental replacement.

Lazzara J, Arthur L, Jenkins C, Dodd C, Mellon S, Murray D Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(12):5407-5412.

PMID: 37768357 PMC: 10719134. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07573-y.


References
1.
Murray D, Liddle A, Liddle A, Dodd C, Pandit H . Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the glass half full or half empty?. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B(10 Suppl A):3-8. PMC: 4632649. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.36542. View

2.
Lee M, Huang Y, Chong H, Ning Y, Lo N, Yeo S . Predicting Satisfaction for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Patients in an Asian Population. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(8):1706-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.005. View

3.
Kleeblad L, van der List J, Zuiderbaan H, Pearle A . Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 26(6):1811-1822. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4817-y. View

4.
Newman J, Pydisetty R, Ackroyd C . Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 91(1):52-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.20899. View

5.
Cameron H, Jung Y . A comparison of unicompartmental knee replacement with total knee replacement. Orthop Rev. 1988; 17(10):983-8. View