» Articles » PMID: 25676725

Is Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) Superior to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2015 Feb 14
PMID 25676725
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods: A systematic review and meta-regression to compare postoperative outcomes of pain VAS, knee function score, range of motion, complications and revision surgery rates between UKA and TKA were conducted. Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from MEDLINE and Scopus from inception to August 29, 2014.

Results: Three of 1056 studies were eligible; two, three, two, three and three studies were included in pooling of pain visual analog score (VAS), Knee Society Score (KSS) and Bristol Knee Score (BKS), maximum knee flexion, postoperative complications (aseptic loosening, progressive degenerative joint disease of lateral compartment, bearing dislocation, DVT, fractures and infection) and revision rates, respectively. The unstandardized mean difference (UMD) of the function scores (KSS, BS) for UKA was 1.62 (95 % CI -1.17, 4.42) better than TKA and for pain score was 0.1 (95 % CI -3.54, 3.73) higher than TKA, but both without statistical significance. UKA was more likely to show higher mean maximum knee flexion with a UMD of 1.88 (95 % CI -0.54, 4.30) when compared to TKA, but was also not statistically significant. UKA had a statistically significant lower chance of postoperative complications by 0.35 U (95 % CI 0.12, 0.98) when compared to TKA, but had higher revision rates than TKA with a value of 5.36 (95 % CI 1.06, 27.08).

Conclusion: In short-term outcomes (5 years or less, with follow-up of 0-5 years), TKA had higher postoperative complications than UKA, but had lower revision rates. There was only one study that reported long-term survivorship (more than 5 years, with follow-up of 5-15 years). Further research that assesses long-term survivorship is necessary to better evaluate UKA and TKA in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis.

Citing Articles

Effect of femoral prosthesis flexion angle on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mobile platform.

Zhou Y, Yuan P, Tang R, Li Y, Tang M J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):725.

PMID: 39506788 PMC: 11542343. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05224-7.


Outcomes of total knee replacement versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.

Lo L, Xu S, Pang H, Tay D, Yeo S, Liow M J Orthop. 2024; 60:134-137.

PMID: 39435134 PMC: 11490907. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.007.


Comparative long-term outcomes of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hu H, Li P, Liu Z, Lv H, Yang X, Liu P Front Surg. 2024; 11:1405025.

PMID: 39233767 PMC: 11371575. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1405025.


Staged Bi-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Contralateral Compartment Failure After Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Dialysis Patients: Two Case Reports.

Inoue A, Arai Y, Yoshihara Y, Nakagawa S, Takahashi K Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62892.

PMID: 39040782 PMC: 11262787. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62892.


One-day surgery is safe and effective in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective comparative study at 1 year of follow-up.

Petrillo S, Lacagnina C, Corbella M, Marullo M, Bargagliotti M, Giorgino R Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024; 32(12):3272-3280.

PMID: 38989783 PMC: 11605031. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12350.


References
1.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336(7650):924-6. PMC: 2335261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. View

2.
Sweeney K, Grubisic M, Marra C, Kendall R, Li L, Lynd L . Comparison of HRQL between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(9 Suppl):187-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.009. View

3.
Amin A, Patton J, Cook R, Gaston M, Brenkel I . Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty?: Results from a matched study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 451:101-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224052.01873.20. View

4.
Fetzer G, Callaghan J, Templeton J, Goetz D, Sullivan P, Kelley S . Posterior cruciate-retaining modular total knee arthroplasty: a 9- to 12-year follow-up investigation. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(8):961-6. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.34824. View

5.
Newman J, Ackroyd C, Shah N . Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(5):862-5. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8835. View