» Articles » PMID: 33293333

Effectiveness of Ambulation to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Admitted to Hospital: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal CMAJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Dec 9
PMID 33293333
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient ambulation is frequently recommended to help prevent venous thromboembolism during hospital admission. Our objective was to synthesize the evidence for ambulation as a prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospital.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials indexed from their inception through April 2020 for studies of adult patients admitted to hospital, in which ambulation or mobilization alone or concomitant with prophylaxis was indicated for prevention of venous thromboembolism. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished trials. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Two reviewers independently screened articles and assessed risk of bias using 2 validated tools. We scored studies on quality of reporting, internal and external validity and study power; combined scores determined the overall quality.

Results: Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria: 8 retrospective and 2 prospective cohorts, 7 RCTs and 1 secondary analysis of an RCT. The intervention (ambulation or mobilized) groups varied across studies. Five studies examined exercise as a therapeutic prophylaxis for thrombosis and 9 described an ambulation protocol. Five studies attempted to quantify amount and duration of patient ambulation and 3 reported ambulation distance. In the 5 studies rated as good or excellent statistical quality, findings were mixed. Incidence of venous thromboembolism was lowest when pharmacologic anticoagulants were added as part of the prescribed prophylaxis regimen.

Interpretation: We did not find high-quality evidence supporting ambulation alone as an effective prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. Ambulation should not be considered an adequate prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism, nor as an adequate reason to discontinue pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism during a patient's hospital admission.

Citing Articles

Advancements in Managing Choledocholithiasis and Acute Cholangitis in the Elderly: A Comprehensive Review.

Chen G, Sha Y, Wang K, Tang R, Zhai Z, Wang Z Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e78492.

PMID: 40051943 PMC: 11884421. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78492.


The Impact of an Early Mobility Protocol on Recovery Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgeries.

Xavier B, Vaithilingan S, Avudaiappan S, Periasamy P Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75980.

PMID: 39835072 PMC: 11743712. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75980.


Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Postoperative Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hong S, Kwon S, Lee J, Moon S, Kim J Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(11).

PMID: 39596942 PMC: 11595993. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111757.


The Clot Stops Here: Insights Into Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Adherence From Two Cases.

Nguyen A, Glaeser A Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71866.

PMID: 39559659 PMC: 11572766. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71866.


The persian version of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire among iranian post-surgery patients: a translation and psychometrics.

Sharif-Nia H, Sivarajan Froelicher E, Shafighi A, Osborne J, Fatehi R, Nowrozi P BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):390.

PMID: 39010142 PMC: 11247876. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01884-6.


References
1.
Karic T, Roe C, Nordenmark T, Becker F, Sorteberg W, Sorteberg A . Effect of early mobilization and rehabilitation on complications in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2016; 126(2):518-526. DOI: 10.3171/2015.12.JNS151744. View

2.
Falck-Ytter Y, Francis C, Johanson N, Curley C, Dahl O, Schulman S . Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012; 141(2 Suppl):e278S-e325S. PMC: 3278063. DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-2404. View

3.
Flanc C, Kakkar V, Clarke M . Postoperative deep-vein thrombosis. Effect of intensive prophylaxis. Lancet. 1969; 1(7593):477-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)91585-2. View

4.
Lau B, Streiff M, Hobson D, Kraus P, Shaffer D, Popoola V . Beneficial "halo effects" of surgical resident performance feedback. J Surg Res. 2016; 205(1):179-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.024. View

5.
Ho V, Dicker R, Haut E . Dissemination, implementation, and de-implementation: the trauma perspective. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020; 5(1):e000423. PMC: 7046940. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000423. View