» Articles » PMID: 23553743

Impact of a Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis "smart Order Set": Improved Compliance, Fewer Events

Overview
Journal Am J Hematol
Specialty Hematology
Date 2013 Apr 5
PMID 23553743
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects over 700,000 Americans annually. Prophylaxis reduces the risk of VTE by 60% but many patients still do not receive risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis. To improve our institution's VTE prophylaxis performance, we developed mandatory computerized clinical decision support-enabled "smart order sets" that required providers to assess VTE risk factors and contraindications to pharmacologic prophylaxis. Using provider responses, the order set recommends evidence-based risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis. To study the impact of our "smart order set" on prescription of risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis and clinical outcomes, we conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients admitted to the Medicine service during one month immediately prior to (November 2007) and a single month subsequent to (April 2010) order set launch. Data collection included patient demographics, VTE risk factors, and the use and type of VTE prophylaxis. The pre- and post-implementation cohorts contained 1,000 and 942 patients, respectively. After implementation of the "smart order set", the prescription of risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis increased from 65.6% to 90.1% (P < 0.0001). Orders for any form of VTE prophylaxis increased from 76.4% to 95.6% (P < 0.0001). Radiographically documented symptomatic VTE within 90 days of hospital discharge declined from 2.5% to 0.7% (P = 0.002). Preventable harm was completely eliminated (1.1% to 0%, P = 0.001) with no difference in major bleeding or all-cause mortality. A VTE prophylaxis computerized clinical decision support-enabled "smart order set" improved prescription of risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis, reduced symptomatic VTE and eliminated preventable harm from VTE without increasing major bleeding.

Citing Articles

Early, Individualized Recommendations for Hospitalized Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Aklilu A, Menez S, Baker M, Brown D, Dircksen K, Dunkley K JAMA. 2024; 332(24):2081-2090.

PMID: 39454050 PMC: 11669049. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.22718.


Impact of Clinical Decision Support with Mandatory versus Voluntary Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment in Hospitalized Patients.

Bahl V, Moote M, Hu H, Campbell Jr D TH Open. 2024; 8(3):e317-e328.

PMID: 39268041 PMC: 11392591. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1790519.


Surgeon-led improvement in compliance with use of sequential compression devices in a neurosurgery patient population.

Windermere S, Sconzo D, Askari A, Filippidis A, Binello E BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 39107035 PMC: 11308877. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002807.


Thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of implementation strategies.

Ratnasekera A, Seng S, Ciarmella M, Gallagher A, Poirier K, Harding E Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024; 9(1):e001420.

PMID: 38686174 PMC: 11057278. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001420.


Assessing Serious Spinal Pathology Using Bayesian Network Decision Support: Development and Validation Study.

Hill A, Joyner C, Keith-Jopp C, Yet B, Tuncer Sakar C, Marsh W JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e44187.

PMID: 37788068 PMC: 10582804. DOI: 10.2196/44187.