» Articles » PMID: 33289782

Evaluation of Volume Change in Oral Cavity Proper Before and After Mandibular Advancement

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Dec 8
PMID 33289782
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the tongue and oral cavity proper volume in pre- and post-bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) patients, and to establish whether there was a correlation between them.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective study that evaluated 12 patients' pre- and post-surgical computed tomography records satisfying the inclusion criteria. Borders were defined for measurement of tongue and oral cavity proper volume. The volume assessment was carried out using 3D slice software.

Results: The mean difference of tongue volume was 5.7 ± 1.7 cm3, which showed high statistical significance. The mean difference of oral cavity proper volume (OCVP) was 6.9 ± 3.4 cm3 and indicated high statistical significance. A very strong positive correlation existed between pre- and post-surgical tongue volume. Positive correlation was also evident between pre and post - surgical OCVP. Medium positive correlation was noted when the difference between pre- and post-surgical tongue and OCVP were assessed.

Conclusions: There was a significant change in volume of tongue and oral cavity proper after BSSO advancement surgery. The space around the tongue, position of tongue, and maxillary and mandibular relationship influence the volume of tongue and oral cavity proper.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Changes of Extraoral, Intraoral, and Tongue Posture After Maxillomandibular Surgery in Skeletal Class III Patients: A Retrospective Volumetric CT Study.

Shruthi J, Parameswaran R, Khan N, Rajkumar B, Parameswaran A J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025; 24(1):90-97.

PMID: 39902453 PMC: 11787138. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-024-02423-x.


Assessment of the correlation between the volume of tongue, oral cavity, tongue/oral cavity volume ratio and the upper airway in unilateral cleft subjects: A CBCT study.

Akbarizadeh F, Fathi N, Hamedani S Oral Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39821608 DOI: 10.1007/s11282-024-00800-3.


Correlation between oral cavity volume and upper airway changes in skeletal Class III patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a pilot cone-beam computed tomography study.

Li G, Chen Z, Li Y, Cai G, Ruan X, Wang T Angle Orthod. 2024; 94(4):432-440.

PMID: 39229952 PMC: 11210515. DOI: 10.2319/112223-774.1.


Influence of second premolar extractions on the volume of the oral cavity proper: a control comparative cone-beam computed tomography volumetric analysis study.

Mladenovic M, Freezer S, Dreyer C, Meade M Angle Orthod. 2023; 94(1):31-38.

PMID: 38145620 PMC: 10928933. DOI: 10.2319/031023-164.1.

References
1.
Yoo E, Murakami S, Takada K, FUCHIHATA H, Sakuda M . Tongue volume in human female adults with mandibular prognathism. J Dent Res. 1996; 75(12):1957-62. DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750120701. View

2.
Brown E, Cheng S, McKenzie D, Butler J, Gandevia S, Bilston L . Tongue and lateral upper airway movement with mandibular advancement. Sleep. 2013; 36(3):397-404. PMC: 3571744. DOI: 10.5665/sleep.2458. View

3.
Oliver R, Evans S . Tongue size, oral cavity size and speech. Angle Orthod. 1986; 56(3):234-43. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1986)056<0234:TSOCSA>2.0.CO;2. View

4.
Do K, Ferreyra H, Healy J, Davidson T . Does tongue size differ between patients with and without sleep-disordered breathing?. Laryngoscope. 2000; 110(9):1552-5. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200009000-00027. View

5.
Gupta S, Garg S, Tandan A, Dwivedi R, Gupta N, Agarwal G . Relationship of the lingual frenum to the mandibular central incisors. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2015; 5(1):40-5. PMC: 4382507. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2014.12.006. View