» Articles » PMID: 19925581

Is the Tongue Position Influenced by the Palatal Vault Dimensions?

Overview
Journal J Oral Rehabil
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2009 Nov 21
PMID 19925581
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The influence of the palatal vault dimensions on tongue position is here studied through evaluation of the in-mouth air cavity (IMAC) volume when the mandible is in maximal intercuspal position. A sample of 35 women (mean age 21.2 +/- 1.0) and 15 men (mean age 22.1 +/- 0.9) was selected. The sagittal cross-section area of the IMAC, which is modulated by the tongue position, was measured on lateral cephalograms. Dental casts were used to measure the palatal vault volume, which was defined by the occlusal plane, the hard palate and the posterior face of the second molars. Palatal vault volume allowed deduction of the IMAC volume through a rule of three procedure relating volume to area ratios. No IMAC could be calculated from cephalograms of 10 subjects who had the tongue stuck to the palate. For the 40 other subjects, the IMAC volume was 8.9 +/- 4.8 mL. It was 2 mL larger in men (n = 14) than in women (n = 26) and was the largest in skeletal Class III and the smallest in skeletal Class II (P > 0.05). IMAC volume was strongly correlated with palatal vault height but neither with palatal width nor length. It was thus assumed that the height of the palatal vault could influence the most observed position of the tongue but this does not exclude a possible growth influence of the tongue on its surrounding skeletal structures.

Citing Articles

Is palatal cavity volume affected by maxillary sinus pathologies? A CBCT study.

Erturk M, Tassoker M, Aydin Kabakci A BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1237.

PMID: 39420302 PMC: 11487692. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05040-9.


Panoramic radiography and patients with disability: a new simple breathing technique to reduce common airspace error.

Scott A, Reed W J Med Radiat Sci. 2022; 69(2):261-266.

PMID: 34984850 PMC: 9163455. DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.564.


Evaluation of volume change in oral cavity proper before and after mandibular advancement.

Rajkumar B, Parameswaran R, Parameswaran A, Vijayalakshmi D Angle Orthod. 2020; 91(1):81-87.

PMID: 33289782 PMC: 8032279. DOI: 10.2319/052420-474.1.


Evaluation of tongue volume and oral cavity capacity using cone-beam computed tomography.

Ding X, Suzuki S, Shiga M, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T, Moriyama K Odontology. 2018; 106(3):266-273.

PMID: 29468332 PMC: 5996000. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-017-0335-0.


Modelling human hard palate shape with Bézier curves.

Janssen R, Moisik S, Dediu D PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0191557.

PMID: 29447175 PMC: 5813942. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191557.