» Articles » PMID: 33285865

How the Probabilistic Structure of Grammatical Context Shapes Speech

Overview
Journal Entropy (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Dec 8
PMID 33285865
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Does systematic covariation in the usage patterns of forms shape the sublexical variance observed in conversational speech? We address this question in terms of a recently proposed discriminative theory of human communication that argues that the distribution of events in communicative contexts should maintain mutual predictability between language users, present evidence that the distributions of words in the empirical contexts in which they are learned and used are geometric, and thus support this. Here, we extend this analysis to a corpus of conversational English, showing that the distribution of grammatical regularities and the sub-distributions of tokens discriminated by them are also geometric. Further analyses reveal a range of structural differences in the distribution of types in parts of speech categories that further support the suggestion that linguistic distributions (and codes) are subcategorized by context at multiple levels of abstraction. Finally, a series of analyses of the variation in spoken language reveals that quantifiable differences in the structure of lexical subcategories appears in turn to systematically shape sublexical variation in speech signal.

Citing Articles

Predictability Associated With Reduction in Phonetic Signals Without Semantics-The Case of Glossolalia.

Link S, Tomaschek F Lang Speech. 2023; 67(1):72-94.

PMID: 37070153 PMC: 10916350. DOI: 10.1177/00238309231163170.


Understanding the Phonetic Characteristics of Speech Under Uncertainty-Implications of the Representation of Linguistic Knowledge in Learning and Processing.

Tomaschek F, Ramscar M Front Psychol. 2022; 13:754395.

PMID: 35548492 PMC: 9083257. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.754395.


Paradigmatic enhancement of stem vowels in regular English inflected verb forms.

Tomaschek F, Tucker B, Ramscar M, Baayen R Morphology (Dordr). 2021; 31(2):171-199.

PMID: 33747253 PMC: 7925464. DOI: 10.1007/s11525-021-09374-w.


Information Theory and Language.

Debowski L, Bentz C Entropy (Basel). 2020; 22(4).

PMID: 33286209 PMC: 7516908. DOI: 10.3390/e22040435.


Order Matters! Influences of Linear Order on Linguistic Category Learning.

Hoppe D, van Rij J, Hendriks P, Ramscar M Cogn Sci. 2020; 44(11):e12910.

PMID: 33124103 PMC: 7685149. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12910.


References
1.
Grosjean F . Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Percept Psychophys. 1980; 28(4):267-83. DOI: 10.3758/bf03204386. View

2.
Seifart F, Strunk J, Danielsen S, Hartmann I, Pakendorf B, Wichmann S . Nouns slow down speech across structurally and culturally diverse languages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(22):5720-5725. PMC: 5984521. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1800708115. View

3.
Klingenstein S, Hitchcock T, DeDeo S . The civilizing process in London's Old Bailey. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(26):9419-24. PMC: 4084475. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1405984111. View

4.
Arnold J, Fagnano M, Tanenhaus M . Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. J Psycholinguist Res. 2003; 32(1):25-36. DOI: 10.1023/a:1021980931292. View

5.
Wedel A, Jackson S, Kaplan A . Functional load and the lexicon: Evidence that syntactic category and frequency relationships in minimal lemma pairs predict the loss of phoneme contrasts in language change. Lang Speech. 2014; 56(Pt 3):395-417. DOI: 10.1177/0023830913489096. View