» Articles » PMID: 33124103

Order Matters! Influences of Linear Order on Linguistic Category Learning

Overview
Journal Cogn Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2020 Oct 30
PMID 33124103
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Linguistic category learning has been shown to be highly sensitive to linear order, and depending on the task, differentially sensitive to the information provided by preceding category markers (premarkers, e.g., gendered articles) or succeeding category markers (postmarkers, e.g., gendered suffixes). Given that numerous systems for marking grammatical categories exist in natural languages, it follows that a better understanding of these findings can shed light on the factors underlying this diversity. In two discriminative learning simulations and an artificial language learning experiment, we identify two factors that modulate linear order effects in linguistic category learning: category structure and the level of abstraction in a category hierarchy. Regarding category structure, we find that postmarking brings an advantage for learning category diagnostic stimulus dimensions, an effect not present when categories are non-confusable. Regarding levels of abstraction, we find that premarking of super-ordinate categories (e.g., noun class) facilitates learning of subordinate categories (e.g., nouns). We present detailed simulations using a plausible candidate mechanism for the observed effects, along with a comprehensive analysis of linear order effects within an expectation-based account of learning. Our findings indicate that linguistic category learning is differentially guided by pre- and postmarking, and that the influence of each is modulated by the specific characteristics of a given category system.

Citing Articles

Affixation patterns in native language and sequence processing by statistical learning mechanisms.

Ordin M Evol Hum Sci. 2025; :1-28.

PMID: 40027139 PMC: 7617444. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2025.6.


Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.

Kaup B, Ulrich R, Bausenhart K, Bryce D, Butz M, Dignath D Psychol Res. 2023; 88(2):307-337.

PMID: 37847268 PMC: 10857976. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w.


Dialects, motivation, and English proficiency: Empirical evidence from China.

Marjerison R, Yang S Front Psychol. 2022; 13:999345.

PMID: 36248592 PMC: 9558723. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999345.


Understanding the Phonetic Characteristics of Speech Under Uncertainty-Implications of the Representation of Linguistic Knowledge in Learning and Processing.

Tomaschek F, Ramscar M Front Psychol. 2022; 13:754395.

PMID: 35548492 PMC: 9083257. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.754395.


An exploration of error-driven learning in simple two-layer networks from a discriminative learning perspective.

Hoppe D, Hendriks P, Ramscar M, van Rij J Behav Res Methods. 2022; 54(5):2221-2251.

PMID: 35032022 PMC: 9579095. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01711-5.


References
1.
Ramscar M, Dye M, Gustafson J, Klein J . Dual routes to cognitive flexibility: learning and response-conflict resolution in the dimensional change card sort task. Child Dev. 2013; 84(4):1308-23. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12044. View

2.
Osgood C . The similarity paradox in human learning; a resolution. Psychol Rev. 1949; 56(3):132-43. DOI: 10.1037/h0057488. View

3.
Reeder P, Newport E, Aslin R . From shared contexts to syntactic categories: the role of distributional information in learning linguistic form-classes. Cogn Psychol. 2012; 66(1):30-54. PMC: 3621024. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.09.001. View

4.
Ramscar M, Yarlett D, Dye M, Denny K, Thorpe K . The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cogn Sci. 2011; 34(6):909-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01092.x. View

5.
Rescorla R . Pavlovian conditioning. It's not what you think it is. Am Psychol. 1988; 43(3):151-60. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.43.3.151. View