» Articles » PMID: 33273812

A Comparison of the Real-Life Clinical Effectiveness of the Leading Licensed ICS/LABA Combination Inhalers in the Treatment for COPD

Abstract

Introduction: The Fostair® 100/6 (BDP/FF) pressurized metered-dose inhaler, delivering an extrafine formulation, is licensed for asthma and COPD in the UK. However, its real-life effectiveness for COPD has not been evaluated. This study compared the clinical effectiveness of BDP/FF against other licensed ICS/LABA combination inhalers: the Seretide® Accuhaler® (FP/SAL) and the Symbicort® Turbohaler® (BUD/FF).

Methods: A matched historical cohort study was conducted using records of patients with diagnostic codes for COPD from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD). Patients who had received BDP/FF as their first ICS/LABA were matched 1:1 with patients who had received FP/SAL or BUD/FF, resulting in two matched comparisons. Additional analysis was conducted on patients who had never had diagnostic codes for asthma. Noninferiority in terms of the proportion of patients with moderate/severe COPD exacerbations on the different inhalers in the following year was assessed. Noninferiority was achieved if the upper CI limit were ≤1.2.

Results: This study included 537 and 540 patient pairs in the BDP/FF vs FP/SAL cohort and the BDP/FF vs BUD/FF cohort, respectively. The proportion of patients with COPD exacerbations in the BDP/FF group was not significantly different from either the FP/SAL (68.7% vs 70.2%, AOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67-1.19) or BUD/FF group (68.5% vs 69.4%, AOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.58-1.08). Noninferiority of BDP/FF in preventing COPD exacerbations was fulfilled in both comparisons. In patients without asthma, BDP/FF was also noninferior to BUD/FF (proportion with COPD exacerbations, 67.8% vs 64.7%, AOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.51-1.1997). Additionally, a significantly lower proportion of patients prescribed BDP/FF had COPD exacerbations than FP/SAL (64.8% vs 73.7%, AOR 0.64 95% CI 0.43-0.96).

Conclusion: Initiating ICS/LABA treatment of COPD with extrafine-formulation BDP/FF was noninferior in preventing moderate/severe exacerbations compared to FP/SAL and BUD/FF.

Citing Articles

Exacerbation history and blood eosinophil count prior to diagnosis of COPD and risk of subsequent exacerbations.

Halpin D, Healey H, Skinner D, Carter V, Pullen R, Price D Eur Respir J. 2024; 64(4).

PMID: 39147410 PMC: 11447287. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02240-2023.

References
1.
Roche N, Reddel H, Agusti A, Bateman E, Krishnan J, Martin R . Integrating real-life studies in the global therapeutic research framework. Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 1(10):e29-30. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70199-1. View

2.
Price D, Chisholm A, Ryan D, Crockett A, Jones R . The use of roflumilast in COPD: a primary care perspective. Prim Care Respir J. 2010; 19(4):342-51. PMC: 6602268. DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2010.00066. View

3.
Price D, West D, Brusselle G, Gruffydd-Jones K, Jones R, Miravitlles M . Management of COPD in the UK primary-care setting: an analysis of real-life prescribing patterns. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014; 9:889-904. PMC: 4154894. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S62750. View

4.
Nannini L, Poole P, Milan S, Kesterton A . Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)-agonist in one inhaler versus inhaled corticosteroids alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (8):CD006826. PMC: 6486274. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006826.pub2. View

5.
Steiner J, Prochazka A . The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50(1):105-16. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00268-5. View