» Articles » PMID: 33260721

Does Multiple Sclerosis Differently Impact Physical Activity in Women and Man? A Quantitative Study Based on Wearable Accelerometers

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Dec 2
PMID 33260721
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), fatigue, weakness and spasticity may reduce mobility and promote sedentary behavior. However, little is known about the existence of possible differences in the way MS modifies the propensity to perform physical activity (PA) in men and women. The present study aimed to partly close this gap by means of quantitative analysis carried out using wearable sensors. Forty-five pwMS (23 F, 22 M, mean age 50.3) and 41 unaffected age- and sex-matched individuals wore a tri-axial accelerometer 24 h/day for 7 consecutive days. Raw data were processed to calculate average number of daily steps, vector magnitude (VM) counts, and percentage of time spent in sedentary behavior and in PA of different intensities (i.e., light and moderate-to-vigorous, MVPA). Women with MS spent more time in sedentary behavior and exhibited a reduced amount of light intensity activity with respect to men, while MVPA was similar across sexes. However, in comparison with unaffected individuals, the overall PA patterns appear significantly modified mostly in women who, in presence of the disease, present increased sedentary behavior, reduced MVPA, number of daily steps and VM counts. The findings of the present study highlight the urgency of including sex as variable in all studies on PA in pwMS.

Citing Articles

Breaking boundaries: the transformative role of exercise in managing multiple sclerosis.

Saedmocheshi S, Yousfi N, Chamari K EXCLI J. 2024; 23:475-490.

PMID: 38741722 PMC: 11089092. DOI: 10.17179/excli2024-6932.


Wearable Sensor Technologies to Assess Motor Functions in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Scoping Review and Perspective.

Woelfle T, Bourguignon L, Lorscheider J, Kappos L, Naegelin Y, Jutzeler C J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e44428.

PMID: 37498655 PMC: 10415952. DOI: 10.2196/44428.


Methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the Actigraph GT3X in multiple sclerosis: A rapid review and comparative study.

Polhemus A, Haag C, Sieber C, Sylvester R, Kool J, Gonzenbach R Front Rehabil Sci. 2022; 3:989658.

PMID: 36518351 PMC: 9742246. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.989658.


Correlates of Objectively Measured Physical Activity Among People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Fortune J, Norris M, Stennett A, Kilbride C, Lavelle G, Hendrie W Front Rehabil Sci. 2022; 2:726436.

PMID: 36188781 PMC: 9397718. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2021.726436.


Recent State of Wearable IMU Sensors Use in People Living with Spasticity: A Systematic Review.

Weizman Y, Tirosh O, Konstantin Fuss F, Tan A, Rutz E Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(5).

PMID: 35270937 PMC: 8914967. DOI: 10.3390/s22051791.


References
1.
Kalron A, Menascu S, Frid L, Aloni R, Achiron A . Physical activity in mild multiple sclerosis: contribution of perceived fatigue, energy cost, and speed of walking. Disabil Rehabil. 2019; 42(9):1240-1246. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1519603. View

2.
Buchan D, McSeveney F, McLellan G . A comparison of physical activity from Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers worn on the dominant and non-dominant wrist. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018; 39(1):51-56. DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12538. View

3.
Althoff T, Sosic R, Hicks J, King A, Delp S, Leskovec J . Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality. Nature. 2017; 547(7663):336-339. PMC: 5774986. DOI: 10.1038/nature23018. View

4.
Polman C, Reingold S, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen J, Filippi M . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011; 69(2):292-302. PMC: 3084507. DOI: 10.1002/ana.22366. View

5.
Sandroff B, Riskin B, Agiovlasitis S, Motl R . Accelerometer cut-points derived during over-ground walking in persons with mild, moderate, and severe multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2014; 340(1-2):50-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.02.024. View