» Articles » PMID: 33259000

Secondary Epiretinal Membrane After Ex-Press Glaucoma Filtration Device Implant

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2020 Dec 1
PMID 33259000
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the frequency of epiretinal membrane (ERM) in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) treated with Ex-Press shunt implant. Secondarily, we aimed to assess the role of concomitant cataract surgery and the impact of the ERM on central foveal thickness and macular volume.

Methods: In this prospective, consecutive, case-control study, we enrolled 54 patients affected by PAOG and scheduled for Ex-Press device implant with or without contemporary phacoemulsification. Contralateral eyes affected by POAG and receiving anti-glaucomatous eyedrops constituted the control group. Complete ophthalmologic evaluation and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed before and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery.

Results: Twenty-six eyes received the Ex-Press implant alone, and 28 eyes underwent the combined procedure. Six months postoperatively, we observed 18 (33%) cases of ERM: 15 (28%) of cellophane macular reflex (CMR) and 3 (6%) of pre-macular fibrosis (PMF). In the control group, 9 (17%) eyes developed an ERM: 8 (15%) were CMR, and 1 (2%) was PMF. The frequency of ERM statistically differs between treated and contralateral eyes (P = 0.032, χ test). The ERM frequency did not statically differ between eyes subjected to simple or combined surgery (P = 0.846, χ test). Mean central foveal thickness and mean macular volume did not significantly differ between groups.

Conclusion: The Ex-Press glaucoma shunt may increase the risk of ERM onset regardless of the concomitant cataract surgery; however, most cases were cellophane macular reflex with limited functional and anatomical impact.

Citing Articles

Does Laser Iridotomy Cause Secondary Epiretinal Membrane?.

Akmaz O, Talay N Turk J Ophthalmol. 2024; 54(5):263-267.

PMID: 39463150 PMC: 11589235. DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.61094.


Epiretinal membrane development after Ex-Press glaucoma filtration device implant: 2-year results of a case control study.

Sartini F, Menchini M, Palma A, Casini G, Figus M Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):93.

PMID: 38367121 PMC: 10874323. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-02958-5.


Evaluation of New and Preexisting Epiretinal Membranes Following Glaucoma Filtration Surgery.

Aoki R, Dote S, Oogi S, Nagata Y, Ueda K, Terao E Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e46441.

PMID: 37927709 PMC: 10622603. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46441.

References
1.
Inoue M, Kadonosono K . Macular diseases: epiretinal membrane. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014; 54:159-63. DOI: 10.1159/000360462. View

2.
Bringmann A, Wiedemann P . Involvement of Müller glial cells in epiretinal membrane formation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009; 247(7):865-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-009-1082-x. View

3.
Bu S, Kuijer R, Van der Worp R, Huiskamp E, Renardel de Lavalette V, Li X . Glial cells and collagens in epiretinal membranes associated with idiopathic macular holes. Retina. 2013; 34(5):897-906. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000013. View

4.
Kang H, Koh H, Lee S . Visual outcome and prognostic factors after surgery for a secondary epiretinal membrane associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014; 253(4):543-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2731-2. View

5.
Hsu Y, Yang C, Yeh P . Clinical and histological features of epiretinal membrane after diabetic vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013; 252(3):401-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2479-0. View