» Articles » PMID: 33258890

Effect of Cannabidiol and Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol on Driving Performance: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Dec 1
PMID 33258890
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Cannabis use has been associated with increased crash risk, but the effect of cannabidiol (CBD) on driving is unclear.

Objective: To determine the driving impairment caused by vaporized cannabis containing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and CBD.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A double-blind, within-participants, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience at Maastricht University in the Netherlands between May 20, 2019, and March 27, 2020. Participants (N = 26) were healthy occasional users of cannabis.

Interventions: Participants vaporized THC-dominant, CBD-dominant, THC/CBD-equivalent, and placebo cannabis. THC and CBD doses were 13.75 mg. Order of conditions was randomized and balanced.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary end point was standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP; a measure of lane weaving) during 100 km, on-road driving tests that commenced at 40 minutes and 240 minutes after cannabis consumption. At a calibrated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.02%, SDLP was increased relative to placebo by 1.12 cm, and at a calibrated BAC of 0.05%, SDLP was increased relative to placebo by 2.4 cm.

Results: Among 26 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 23.2 [2.6] years; 16 women), 22 (85%) completed all 8 driving tests. At 40 to 100 minutes following consumption, the SDLP was 18.21 cm with CBD-dominant cannabis, 20.59 cm with THC-dominant cannabis, 21.09 cm with THC/CBD-equivalent cannabis, and 18.28 cm with placebo cannabis. SDLP was significantly increased by THC-dominant cannabis (+2.33 cm [95% CI, 0.80 to 3.86]; P < .001) and THC/CBD-equivalent cannabis (+2.83 cm [95% CI, 1.28 to 4.39]; P < .001) but not CBD-dominant cannabis (-0.05 cm [95% CI, -1.49 to 1.39]; P > .99), relative to placebo. At 240 to 300 minutes following consumption, the SDLP was 19.03 cm with CBD-dominant cannabis, 19.88 cm with THC-dominant cannabis, 20.59 cm with THC/CBD-equivalent cannabis, and 19.37 cm with placebo cannabis. The SDLP did not differ significantly in the CBD (-0.34 cm [95% CI, -1.77 to 1.10]; P > .99), THC (0.51 cm [95% CI, -1.01 to 2.02]; P > .99) or THC/CBD (1.22 cm [95% CI, -0.29 to 2.72]; P = .20) conditions, relative to placebo. Out of 188 test drives, 16 (8.5%) were terminated due to safety concerns.

Conclusions And Relevance: In a crossover clinical trial that assessed driving performance during on-road driving tests, the SDLP following vaporized THC-dominant and THC/CBD-equivalent cannabis compared with placebo was significantly greater at 40 to 100 minutes but not 240 to 300 minutes after vaporization; there were no significant differences between CBD-dominant cannabis and placebo. However, the effect size for CBD-dominant cannabis may not have excluded clinically important impairment, and the doses tested may not represent common usage.

Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials Register: 2018-003945-40.

Citing Articles

Hospitalization for carbon monoxide poisoning is associated with substance use and mood disorders.

Weigel B, Manadan J, Manadan N, Mycyk M Intern Emerg Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39821180 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03839-6.


Potential Risks from Cannabis-Infused Beverages: A Critical Review.

Froude A, Pangborn N, Britz-McKibbin P, MacKillop J, Balodis I Cannabis. 2025; 7(3):134-166.

PMID: 39781553 PMC: 11705039. DOI: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000271.


Effects of cannabidiol on AMPKα2 /HIF-1α/BNIP3/NIX signaling pathway in skeletal muscle injury.

Hou Z, Wang Z, Zhang J, Liu Y, Luo Z Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1450513.

PMID: 39502531 PMC: 11536269. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1450513.


The effects of standardized cannabis products in healthy volunteers and patients: a systematic literature review.

Leen N, Kowal M, Batalla A, Bossong M Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1411631.

PMID: 39484170 PMC: 11524849. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1411631.


Attitudes toward driving after cannabis use: a systematic review.

Boicu B, Al-Hakim D, Yuan Y, Brubacher J J Cannabis Res. 2024; 6(1):37.

PMID: 39342388 PMC: 11439277. DOI: 10.1186/s42238-024-00240-0.


References
1.
Jongen S, van der Sluiszen N, Brown D, Vuurman E . Single- and dual-task performance during on-the-road driving at a low and moderate dose of alcohol: A comparison between young novice and more experienced drivers. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2018; 33(3):e2661. PMC: 6001797. DOI: 10.1002/hup.2661. View

2.
Casswell S, Marks D . Cannabis induced impairment of performance of a divided attention task. Nature. 1973; 241(5384):60-1. DOI: 10.1038/241060b0. View

3.
Ramaekers J, Moeller M, Van Ruitenbeek P, Theunissen E, Schneider E, Kauert G . Cognition and motor control as a function of Delta9-THC concentration in serum and oral fluid: limits of impairment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006; 85(2):114-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.03.015. View

4.
Lintzeris N, Mills L, Suraev A, Bravo M, Arkell T, Arnold J . Medical cannabis use in the Australian community following introduction of legal access: the 2018-2019 Online Cross-Sectional Cannabis as Medicine Survey (CAMS-18). Harm Reduct J. 2020; 17(1):37. PMC: 7278204. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-020-00377-0. View

5.
Chesney E, Oliver D, Green A, Sovi S, Wilson J, Englund A . Adverse effects of cannabidiol: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020; 45(11):1799-1806. PMC: 7608221. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-020-0667-2. View