The Effect of Cannabis Edibles on Driving and Blood THC

Overview

Journal J Cannabis Res

Date 2024 Jun 1

PMID 38822413

Authors

S Zhao

B Brands

P Kaduri

C M Wickens

O S M Hasan

S Chen

B Le Foll

P Di Ciano

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Cannabis has been shown to impact driving due to changes produced by delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive component of cannabis. Current legal thresholds for blood THC while driving are based predominantly on evidence utilizing smoked cannabis. It is known that levels of THC in blood are lower after eating cannabis as compared to smoking yet the impact of edibles on driving and associated blood THC has never been studied.

Methods: Participants drove a driving simulator before and after ingesting their preferred legally purchased cannabis edible. In a counterbalanced control session, participants did not consume any THC or cannabidiol (CBD). Blood was collected for measurement of THC and metabolites as well as CBD. Subjective experience was also assessed.

Results: Participants consumed edibles with, on average, 7.3 mg of THC, which is less than the maximum amount available in a single retail package in Ontario, providing an ecologically valid test of cannabis edibles. Compared to control, cannabis edibles produced a decrease in mean speed 2 h after consumption but not at 4 and 6 h. Under dual task conditions in which participants completed a secondary task while driving, changes in speed were not significant after the correction for multiple comparison. No changes in standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP; 'weaving'), maximum speed, standard deviation of speed or reaction time were found at any time point or under either standard or dual task conditions. Mean THC levels were significantly increased, relative to control, after consuming the edible but remained relatively low at approximately 2.8 ng/mL 2 h after consumption. Driving impairment was not correlated with blood THC. Subjective experience was altered for 7 h and participants were less willing/able to drive for up to 6 h, suggesting that the edible was intoxicating.

Interpretation: This is the first study of the impact of cannabis edibles on simulated driving. Edibles were intoxicating as revealed by the results of subjective assessments (VAS), and there was some impact on driving. Detection of driving impairment after the use of cannabis edibles may be difficult.

References

Bosker W, Kuypers K, Theunissen E, Surinx A, Blankespoor R, Skopp G . Medicinal Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (dronabinol) impairs on-the-road driving performance of occasional and heavy cannabis users but is not detected in Standard Field Sobriety Tests. Addiction. 2012; 107(10):1837-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03928.x. View

Rogeberg O . A meta-analysis of the crash risk of cannabis-positive drivers in culpability studies-Avoiding interpretational bias. Accid Anal Prev. 2018; 123:69-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.011. View

Sharma P, Murthy P, Srinivas Bharath M . Chemistry, metabolism, and toxicology of cannabis: clinical implications. Iran J Psychiatry. 2013; 7(4):149-56. PMC: 3570572. View

AGURELL S, Halldin M, Lindgren J, Ohlsson A, Widman M, Gillespie H . Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of delta 1-tetrahydrocannabinol and other cannabinoids with emphasis on man. Pharmacol Rev. 1986; 38(1):21-43. View

Grotenhermen F . Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003; 42(4):327-60. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200342040-00003. View

Ronen A, Gershon P, Drobiner H, Rabinovich A, Bar-Hamburger R, Mechoulam R . Effects of THC on driving performance, physiological state and subjective feelings relative to alcohol. Accid Anal Prev. 2008; 40(3):926-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.10.011. View

Veldstra J, Bosker W, De Waard D, Ramaekers J, Brookhuis K . Comparing treatment effects of oral THC on simulated and on-the-road driving performance: testing the validity of driving simulator drug research. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015; 232(16):2911-9. PMC: 4513227. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-015-3927-9. View

Newmeyer M, Swortwood M, Taylor M, Abulseoud O, Woodward T, Huestis M . Evaluation of divided attention psychophysical task performance and effects on pupil sizes following smoked, vaporized and oral cannabis administration. J Appl Toxicol. 2017; 37(8):922-932. DOI: 10.1002/jat.3440. View

Downey L, King R, Papafotiou K, Swann P, Ogden E, Boorman M . The effects of cannabis and alcohol on simulated driving: Influences of dose and experience. Accid Anal Prev. 2012; 50:879-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.07.016. View

10.

Rogeberg O, Elvik R . The effects of cannabis intoxication on motor vehicle collision revisited and revised. Addiction. 2016; 111(8):1348-59. DOI: 10.1111/add.13347. View

11.

Sewell R, Poling J, Sofuoglu M . The effect of cannabis compared with alcohol on driving. Am J Addict. 2009; 18(3):185-93. PMC: 2722956. DOI: 10.1080/10550490902786934. View

12.

Newmeyer M, Swortwood M, Abulseoud O, Huestis M . Subjective and physiological effects, and expired carbon monoxide concentrations in frequent and occasional cannabis smokers following smoked, vaporized, and oral cannabis administration. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017; 175:67-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.02.003. View

13.

Hartman R, Brown T, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Pierce R, Gorelick D . Cannabis effects on driving longitudinal control with and without alcohol. J Appl Toxicol. 2016; 36(11):1418-29. DOI: 10.1002/jat.3295. View

14.

Marcotte T, Umlauf A, Grelotti D, Sones E, Sobolesky P, Smith B . Driving Performance and Cannabis Users' Perception of Safety: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022; 79(3):201-209. PMC: 8792796. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.4037. View

15.

Ball K, Owsley C, Sloane M, Roenker D, BRUNI J . Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34(11):3110-23. View

16.

Lenne M, Dietze P, Triggs T, Walmsley S, Murphy B, Redman J . The effects of cannabis and alcohol on simulated arterial driving: Influences of driving experience and task demand. Accid Anal Prev. 2010; 42(3):859-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.021. View

17.

Simmons S, Caird J, Sterzer F, Asbridge M . The effects of cannabis and alcohol on driving performance and driver behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2022; 117(7):1843-1856. DOI: 10.1111/add.15770. View

18.

Fares A, Wickens C, Mann R, Di Ciano P, Wright M, Matheson J . Combined effect of alcohol and cannabis on simulated driving. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021; 239(5):1263-1277. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-021-05773-3. View

19.

Hartley S, Simon N, Larabi A, Vaugier I, Barbot F, Quera-Salva M . Effect of Smoked Cannabis on Vigilance and Accident Risk Using Simulated Driving in Occasional and Chronic Users and the Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship. Clin Chem. 2019; 65(5):684-693. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.299727. View

20.

Budney A, Novy P, Hughes J . Marijuana withdrawal among adults seeking treatment for marijuana dependence. Addiction. 2000; 94(9):1311-22. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.94913114.x. View