» Articles » PMID: 33257177

Loneliness During a Strict Lockdown: Trajectories and Predictors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 38,217 United Kingdom Adults

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 2020 Dec 1
PMID 33257177
Citations 197
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: There are increasing worries that lockdowns and 'stay-at-home' orders due to the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to a rise in loneliness, which is recognised as a major public health concern. But profiles of loneliness during the pandemic and risk factors remain unclear.

Objective: The current study aimed to examine if and how loneliness levels changed during the strict lockdown and to explore the clustering of loneliness growth trajectories.

Methods: Data from 38,217 UK adults in the UCL COVID -19 Social Study (a panel study collecting data weekly during the pandemic) were analysed during the strict lockdown period in the UK (23/03/2020-10/05/2020). The sample was well-stratified and weighted to population proportions of gender, age, ethnicity, education and geographical location. Growth mixture modelling was used to identify the latent classes of loneliness growth trajectories and their predictors.

Results: Analyses revealed four classes, with the baseline loneliness level ranging from low to high. In the first a few weeks of lockdown, loneliness levels increased in the highest loneliness group, decreased in the lowest loneliness group, and stayed relatively constant in the middle two groups. Younger adults (OR = 2.17-6.81), women (OR = 1.59), people with low income (OR = 1.3), the economically inactive (OR = 1.3-2.04) and people with mental health conditions (OR = 5.32) were more likely to be in highest loneliness class relative to the lowest. Further, living with others or in a rural area, and having more close friends or greater social support were protective.

Conclusions: Perceived levels of loneliness under strict lockdown measures due to COVID-19 were relatively stable in the UK, but for many people these levels were high with no signs of improvement. Results suggest that more efforts are needed to address loneliness.

Citing Articles

The Moderated Mediating Effects of Social Media Identity and Loneliness on the Relationship Between Problematic Internet Use and Mental Health in China: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Liu C, Liu Y, Liu C, Lin R, Wang X, Zhang X J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e57907.

PMID: 40009436 PMC: 11904383. DOI: 10.2196/57907.


Understanding Loneliness in Older Adults During the Pandemic: Predictors and Questionnaire Validation.

Orlandini R, Lusic Kalcina L, Anticevic V Diseases. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39997052 PMC: 11853930. DOI: 10.3390/diseases13020045.


From strain to strength: a yearlong study on the transformative influence of inner engineering online program on mental well-being.

Swaminathan A, DeSchryver B, Rayapuraju A, Barbaro J, Orui H, Subramaniam B Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1436910.

PMID: 39968198 PMC: 11832524. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1436910.


Will things feel better in the morning? A time-of-day analysis of mental health and wellbeing from nearly 1 million observations.

Bu F, Bone J, Fancourt D BMJ Ment Health. 2025; 28(1).

PMID: 39904722 PMC: 11795389. DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301418.


Loneliness-associated factors among older adults: Focus on friendship type and number of friends.

Inoue Y, Hamada H, Nakatani H, Ono I Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2025; 22(1):e12649.

PMID: 39828632 PMC: 11743425. DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12649.


References
1.
Wang J, Mann F, Lloyd-Evans B, Ma R, Johnson S . Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2018; 18(1):156. PMC: 5975705. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1736-5. View

2.
Hackett R, Hamer M, Endrighi R, Brydon L, Steptoe A . Loneliness and stress-related inflammatory and neuroendocrine responses in older men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012; 37(11):1801-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.03.016. View

3.
Cacioppo J, Fowler J, Christakis N . Alone in the crowd: the structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009; 97(6):977-91. PMC: 2792572. DOI: 10.1037/a0016076. View

4.
Cole S, Hawkley L, Arevalo J, Sung C, Rose R, Cacioppo J . Social regulation of gene expression in human leukocytes. Genome Biol. 2007; 8(9):R189. PMC: 2375027. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r189. View

5.
Holmes E, OConnor R, Perry V, Tracey I, Wessely S, Arseneault L . Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(6):547-560. PMC: 7159850. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1. View