» Articles » PMID: 33199541

Transitions Between Cigarette, ENDS and Dual Use in Adults in the PATH Study (waves 1-4): Multistate Transition Modelling Accounting for Complex Survey Design

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2020 Nov 17
PMID 33199541
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Even prior to 2018, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) began to dramatically change the landscape of tobacco products and product use patterns in the USA.

Methods: Using a Markov multistate transition model accounting for complex survey design, transition rates between never, non-current, cigarette, ENDS and dual use states were estimated for 23 253 adult participants in waves 1-4 (approximately 2013-2017) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study. We made short-term transition projections and estimated HRs for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education and income.

Results: Cigarette use was persistent among adults, with 89.7% (95% CI 89.1% to 90.3%) of exclusive cigarette users and 86.1% (95% CI 84.4% to 87.9%) of dual users remaining cigarette users (either exclusive or dual) after one wave. In contrast, ENDS use was less persistent, with 72.1% (95% CI 69.6% to 74.6%) of exclusive ENDS users and 50.5% (95% CI 47.8% to 53.3%) of dual users remaining ENDS users (with or without cigarettes) after one wave. Exclusive ENDS users were more likely to start cigarette use after one wave than either never users (HR 25.2; 95% CI 20.9 to 30.5) or non-current users (HR 5.0; 95% CI 4.3 to 5.8). Dual users of ENDS and cigarettes were more likely to stop using cigarettes than exclusive cigarette users (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.6 to 2.3). Transition rates varied among sociodemographic groups.

Conclusions: Multistate transition models are an effective tool for uncovering and characterising longitudinal patterns and determinants of tobacco use from complex survey data. ENDS use among US adults was less persistent than cigarette use prior to 2018.

Citing Articles

The Canadian Lung Outcomes in Users of Vaping Devices (CLOUD) Study: protocol for a prospective, observational cohort study.

Burns P, Eddy R, Li X, Yang J, Dhillon S, Couillard S BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e100568.

PMID: 40050062 PMC: 11887296. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100568.


Switching behavior and changes in smoking behavior by menthol cigarette preference and menthol heated tobacco product use among adults in the United States who smoke cigarettes: an actual use study.

Karelitz J, He Y, Becker E, Vansickel A Harm Reduct J. 2025; 22(1):19.

PMID: 39980000 PMC: 11841305. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-025-01170-7.


Social Epidemiology of Dual Use of Electronic and Combustible Cigarettes Among U.S. Adults: Insights from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

Assari S, Sheikhattari P Glob J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024; 3(1):13-23.

PMID: 39640561 PMC: 11618684. DOI: 10.31586/gjcd.2024.1131.


Adult Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Use in the USA: a Scoping Review Through a Health Equity Lens.

Suttiratana S, Kong G, Li W, Ouellette R, Balasuriya L, Funaro M Curr Addict Rep. 2024; 10(4):825-836.

PMID: 39372844 PMC: 11452013. DOI: 10.1007/s40429-023-00521-3.


Childhood Transitions Between Weight Status Categories: Evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort Study.

Onyimadu O, Astbury N, Achana F, Petrou S, Violato M Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(6):649-661.

PMID: 38568340 PMC: 11126508. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01361-3.


References
1.
Bullen C, Howe C, Laugesen M, McRobbie H, Parag V, Williman J . Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013; 382(9905):1629-37. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61842-5. View

2.
Levy D, Fong G, Cummings K, Borland R, Abrams D, Villanti A . The need for a comprehensive framework. Addiction. 2016; 112(1):22-24. PMC: 5396387. DOI: 10.1111/add.13600. View

3.
Piper M, Baker T, Benowitz N, Jorenby D . Changes in Use Patterns Over 1 Year Among Smokers and Dual Users of Combustible and Electronic Cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019; 22(5):672-680. PMC: 7457322. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz065. View

4.
Sussman S, Levy D, Hassmiller Lich K, Cene C, Kim M, Rohrbach L . Comparing effects of tobacco use prevention modalities: need for complex system models. Tob Induc Dis. 2013; 11(1):2. PMC: 3567972. DOI: 10.1186/1617-9625-11-2. View

5.
Levy D, Yuan Z, Luo Y, Abrams D . The Relationship of E-Cigarette Use to Cigarette Quit Attempts and Cessation: Insights From a Large, Nationally Representative U.S. Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017; 20(8):931-939. PMC: 6037106. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx166. View