» Articles » PMID: 24029165

Electronic Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Lancet
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 Sep 14
PMID 24029165
Citations 518
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) can deliver nicotine and mitigate tobacco withdrawal and are used by many smokers to assist quit attempts. We investigated whether e-cigarettes are more effective than nicotine patches at helping smokers to quit.

Methods: We did this pragmatic randomised-controlled superiority trial in Auckland, New Zealand, between Sept 6, 2011, and July 5, 2013. Adult (≥18 years) smokers wanting to quit were randomised (with computerised block randomisation, block size nine, stratified by ethnicity [Māori; Pacific; or non-Māori, non-Pacific], sex [men or women], and level of nicotine dependence [>5 or ≤5 Fagerström test for nicotine dependence]) in a 4:4:1 ratio to 16 mg nicotine e-cigarettes, nicotine patches (21 mg patch, one daily), or placebo e-cigarettes (no nicotine), from 1 week before until 12 weeks after quit day, with low intensity behavioural support via voluntary telephone counselling. The primary outcome was biochemically verified continuous abstinence at 6 months (exhaled breath carbon monoxide measurement <10 ppm). Primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12610000866000.

Findings: 657 people were randomised (289 to nicotine e-cigarettes, 295 to patches, and 73 to placebo e-cigarettes) and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 6 months, verified abstinence was 7·3% (21 of 289) with nicotine e-cigarettes, 5·8% (17 of 295) with patches, and 4·1% (three of 73) with placebo e-cigarettes (risk difference for nicotine e-cigarette vs patches 1·51 [95% CI -2·49 to 5·51]; for nicotine e-cigarettes vs placebo e-cigarettes 3·16 [95% CI -2·29 to 8·61]). Achievement of abstinence was substantially lower than we anticipated for the power calculation, thus we had insufficient statistical power to conclude superiority of nicotine e-cigarettes to patches or to placebo e-cigarettes. We identified no significant differences in adverse events, with 137 events in the nicotine e-cigarettes group, 119 events in the patches group, and 36 events in the placebo e-cigarettes group. We noted no evidence of an association between adverse events and study product.

Interpretation: E-cigarettes, with or without nicotine, were modestly effective at helping smokers to quit, with similar achievement of abstinence as with nicotine patches, and few adverse events. Uncertainty exists about the place of e-cigarettes in tobacco control, and more research is urgently needed to clearly establish their overall benefits and harms at both individual and population levels.

Funding: Health Research Council of New Zealand.

Citing Articles

Patterns of Use of e-Cigarettes and Their Respiratory Effects: A Critical Umbrella Review.

La Rosa G, Polosa R, OLeary R Tob Use Insights. 2025; 18:1179173X251325421.

PMID: 40078697 PMC: 11898095. DOI: 10.1177/1179173X251325421.


EBM BLS: E-Cigarettes and Varenicline are Both Effective for Smoking Cessation.

Qadir N, Palacio C, Fuest S J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40016379 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09354-4.


The effects of flavored vaped e-liquids on cultured human macrophages derived from the central and peripheral nervous systems.

Bradley C, Walker-Franklin I, Kovach A, Sivaraman V, Onyenwoke R Toxicol In Vitro. 2025; 104:106013.

PMID: 39894183 PMC: 11845287. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106013.


Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Lindson N, Butler A, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Hajek P, Wu A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 1:CD010216.

PMID: 39878158 PMC: 11776059. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.


A systematic review on risk factors and reasons for e-cigarette use in adolescents.

Villanueva-Blasco V, Belda-Ferri L, Vazquez-Martinez A Tob Induc Dis. 2025; 23.

PMID: 39822244 PMC: 11734163. DOI: 10.18332/tid/196679.