» Articles » PMID: 33178466

Failure of Nonoperative Management Following Angioembolization for Blunt Splenic and Pancreatic Tail Injury

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2020 Nov 12
PMID 33178466
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over several decades, standard management of blunt spleen injury (BSI) has been changed from operative intervention to the selective operative and nonoperative management (NOM). However, some patient needs laparotomy first. This article describes a case of a BSI patient who failed nonoperative management after angioembolization (AE). . A 58-year-old man fell from his motorcycle and was brought to our hospital. His vital sign was stable after extracellular fluid bolus. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen showed AAST grade V spleen injury. AE was performed for the splenic artery, but his systolic blood pressure suddenly dropped under 60 mmHg. The resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta was inserted, and immediate laparotomy was performed. A pancreatic tail injury was detected, and the splenic artery and vein were burst at the pancreatic tail and controlled by hemostatic suture. After splenectomy, a drain was placed at the pancreatic tail and the abdomen was temporally closed. The postoperative course was not remarkable except for abdominal abscess treated with antibiotics, and he was discharged on foot.

Conclusion: Although NOM is becoming one of the choices for severe BSI, there will still be a patient who requires surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the mechanism of injury and the limitation of AE as an adjunct to NOM. Patient selection for initial NOM and timing to convert to laparotomy are important.

References
1.
Stassen N, Bhullar I, Cheng J, Crandall M, Friese R, Guillamondegui O . Selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73(5 Suppl 4):S294-300. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182702afc. View

2.
Crichton J, Naidoo K, Yet B, Brundage S, Perkins Z . The role of splenic angioembolization as an adjunct to nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 83(5):934-943. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001649. View

3.
Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Corsi A, Farinella E, Listorti C, Trastulli S . Is non-operative management safe and effective for all splenic blunt trauma? A systematic review. Crit Care. 2013; 17(5):R185. PMC: 4056798. DOI: 10.1186/cc12868. View

4.
Eastridge B, Salinas J, McManus J, Blackburn L, Bugler E, Cooke W . Hypotension begins at 110 mm Hg: redefining "hypotension" with data. J Trauma. 2007; 63(2):291-7. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31809ed924. View

5.
Hasler R, Nuesch E, Juni P, Bouamra O, Exadaktylos A, Lecky F . Systolic blood pressure below 110 mm Hg is associated with increased mortality in blunt major trauma patients: multicentre cohort study. Resuscitation. 2011; 82(9):1202-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.021. View