Is Non-operative Management Safe and Effective for All Splenic Blunt Trauma? A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Crit Care

Specialty Critical Care

Date 2013 Sep 6

PMID 24004931

Citations 35

Authors

Roberto Cirocchi

Carlo Boselli

Alessia Corsi

Eriberto Farinella

Chiara Listorti

Stefano Trastulli

Claudio Renzi

Jacopo Desiderio

Alberto Santoro

Lucio Cagini

Amilcare Parisi

Adriano Redler

Giuseppe Noya

Abe Fingerhut

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The goal of non-operative management (NOM) for blunt splenic trauma (BST) is to preserve the spleen. The advantages of NOM for minor splenic trauma have been extensively reported, whereas its value for the more severe splenic injuries is still debated. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available published evidence on NOM in patients with splenic trauma and to compare it with the operative management (OM) in terms of mortality, morbidity and duration of hospital stay.

Methods: For this systematic review we followed the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" statement. A systematic search was performed on PubMed for studies published from January 2000 to December 2011, without language restrictions, which compared NOM vs. OM for splenic trauma injuries and which at least 10 patients with BST.

Results: We identified 21 non randomized studies: 1 Clinical Controlled Trial and 20 retrospective cohort studies analyzing a total of 16,940 patients with BST. NOM represents the gold standard treatment for minor splenic trauma and is associated with decreased mortality in severe splenic trauma (4.78% vs. 13.5% in NOM and OM, respectively), according to the literature. Of note, in BST treated operatively, concurrent injuries accounted for the higher mortality. In addition, it was not possible to determine post-treatment morbidity in major splenic trauma. The definition of hemodynamic stability varied greatly in the literature depending on the surgeon and the trauma team, representing a further bias. Moreover, data on the remaining analyzed outcomes (hospital stay, number of blood transfusions, abdominal abscesses, overwhelming post-splenectomy infection) were not reported in all included studies or were not comparable, precluding the possibility to perform a meaningful cumulative analysis and comparison.

Conclusions: NOM of BST, preserving the spleen, is the treatment of choice for the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grades I and II. Conclusions are more difficult to outline for higher grades of splenic injury, because of the substantial heterogeneity of expertise among different hospitals, and potentially inappropriate comparison groups.

Citing Articles

Impact of early arterial-phase multidetector CT in blunt spleen injury: a clinical outcomes-oriented study.

Wang Y, Wu Y, Chen H, Tee Y, Fu C, Liao C BMC Med Imaging. 2025; 25(1):39.

PMID: 39905299 PMC: 11796034. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-025-01564-w.

Surgical Treatment versus Conservative Management of Splenic Rupture: Outcomes and Risk Factors.

Eshraghi R, Shamsi S, Safaee M Bull Emerg Trauma. 2024; 12(1):15-20.

PMID: 38689793 PMC: 11057449. DOI: 10.30476/BEAT.2024.101350.1489.

Comparative effectiveness of angioembolization versus open surgery in patients with blunt splenic injury.

Suzuki T, Shiraishi A, Ito K, Otomo Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8800.

PMID: 38627581 PMC: 11021531. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59420-w.

Splenic artery embolisation for splenic injury during colonoscopy: A systematic review.

Lukies M, Clements W United European Gastroenterol J. 2023; 12(1):44-55.

PMID: 38047383 PMC: 10859723. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12498.

Gunshot Abdominal Injuries: A Report of Two Cases and a Review of the Literature.

Elek Z, Igrutinovic G, Grujic B, Djordjevic I, Konstantinovic S Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(10).

PMID: 37893431 PMC: 10608422. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59101713.

References

Smith Jr J, Cooney R, Mucha Jr P . Nonoperative management of the ruptured spleen: a revalidation of criteria. Surgery. 1996; 120(4):745-50; discussion 750-1. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80026-2. View

Wahl W, Ahrns K, Chen S, Hemmila M, Rowe S, Arbabi S . Blunt splenic injury: operation versus angiographic embolization. Surgery. 2004; 136(4):891-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.026. View

Pachter H, Guth A, Hofstetter S, SPENCER F . Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management. Ann Surg. 1998; 227(5):708-17; discussion 717-9. PMC: 1191351. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199805000-00011. View

Rodeghiero F, Ruggeri M . Short- and long-term risks of splenectomy for benign haematological disorders: should we revisit the indications?. Br J Haematol. 2012; 158(1):16-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09146.x. View

Kuo W, Lin H, Foo N, Guo H, Jen C, Chen K . Will computed tomography (CT) miss something? The characteristics and pitfalls of torso CT in evaluating patients with blunt solid organ trauma. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011; 17(3):215-9. DOI: 10.5505/tjtes.2011.12844. View

Carobbi A, Romagnani F, Antonelli G, Bianchini M . Laparoscopic splenectomy for severe blunt trauma: initial experience of ten consecutive cases with a fast hemostatic technique. Surg Endosc. 2009; 24(6):1325-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0768-9. View

Sanders M, Civil I . Adult splenic injuries: treatment patterns and predictive indicators. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999; 69(6):430-2. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01594.x. View

Cagini L, Vannucci J, Scialpi M, Puma F . Diagnosis and endovascular treatment of an internal mammary artery injury. J Emerg Med. 2012; 44(1):e117-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.035. View

Neal M, Hoffman M, Cuschieri J, Minei J, Maier R, Harbrecht B . Crystalloid to packed red blood cell transfusion ratio in the massively transfused patient: when a little goes a long way. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 72(4):892-8. PMC: 3347772. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823d84a7. View

10.

Di Saverio S, Moore E, Tugnoli G, Naidoo N, Ansaloni L, Bonilauri S . Non operative management of liver and spleen traumatic injuries: a giant with clay feet. World J Emerg Surg. 2012; 7(1):3. PMC: 3275476. DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-7-3. View

11.

Harbrecht B, Ko S, Watson G, Forsythe R, Rosengart M, Peitzman A . Angiography for blunt splenic trauma does not improve the success rate of nonoperative management. J Trauma. 2007; 63(1):44-9. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180686531. View

12.

Cagini L, Boaron M, Corneli G, Gambale G, Cirocchi R, Giustozzi G . Rupture of the azygos vein in blunt chest trauma. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1998; 39(2):249-50. View

13.

Coignard-Biehler H, Lanternier F, Hot A, Salmon D, Berger A, de Montalembert M . Adherence to preventive measures after splenectomy in the hospital setting and in the community. J Infect Public Health. 2011; 4(4):187-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.06.004. View

14.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

15.

Koo M, Sabate A, Magallo P, Garcia M, Dominguez J, De Lama M . [Multidisciplinary protocol for computed tomography imaging and angiographic embolization of splenic injury due to trauma: assessment of pre-protocol and post-protocol outcomes]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012; 58(9):538-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0034-9356(11)70137-2. View

16.

Upadhyaya P . Conservative management of splenic trauma: history and current trends. Pediatr Surg Int. 2003; 19(9-10):617-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-003-0972-y. View

17.

Fick A, Raychaudhuri P, Bear J, Roy G, Balogh Z, Kumar R . Factors predicting the need for splenectomy in children with blunt splenic trauma. ANZ J Surg. 2012; 81(10):717-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05591.x. View

18.

Resende V, Petroianu A . Functions of the splenic remnant after subtotal splenectomy for treatment of severe splenic injuries. Am J Surg. 2003; 185(4):311-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)01407-1. View

19.

Velmahos G, Zacharias N, Emhoff T, Feeney J, Hurst J, Crookes B . Management of the most severely injured spleen: a multicenter study of the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (ReCONECT). Arch Surg. 2010; 145(5):456-60. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.58. View

20.

Franklin G, Casos S . Current advances in the surgical approach to abdominal trauma. Injury. 2006; 37(12):1143-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.018. View