» Articles » PMID: 33166672

Full Range of Population Eliciting Dose Values for 14 Priority Allergenic Foods and Recommendations for Use in Risk Characterization

Overview
Date 2020 Nov 9
PMID 33166672
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previously, we published selected Eliciting Dose (ED) values (i.e. ED01 and ED05 values) for 14 allergenic foods, predicted to elicit objective allergic symptoms in 1% and 5%, respectively, of the allergic population (Remington et al., 2020). These ED01 and ED05 values were specifically presented and discussed in the context of establishing Reference Doses for allergen management and the calculation of Action Levels for Precautionary Allergen Labeling (PAL). In the current paper, we publish the full range of ED values for these allergenic foods and provide recommendations for their use, specifically in the context of characterizing risks of concentrations of (unintended) allergenic proteins in food products. The data provided in this publication give risk assessors access to full population ED distribution information for 14 priority allergenic foods, based on the largest threshold database worldwide. The ED distributions were established using broad international consensus regarding suitable datapoints and methods for establishing individual patient's NOAELs and LOAELs and state of the art statistical modelling. Access to these ED data enables risk assessors to use this information for state-of-the-art food allergen risk assessment. This paper contributes to a harmonization of food allergen risk assessment and risk management and PAL practices.

Citing Articles

Scalable electrochemical system for rapid on-site detection of food allergens.

Cho Y, Choi Y, Kim S, Kim H, Chow K, Shin I Biosens Bioelectron. 2025; 273:117142.

PMID: 39832405 PMC: 11788024. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2025.117142.


The baked side: Cow's milk and egg protein threshold dose distributions in children reacting to baked milk and baked egg.

Valluzzi R, Riccardi C, Urbani S, Ursi D, Zavettieri D, Di Girolamo F World Allergy Organ J. 2025; 18(1):101012.

PMID: 39791114 PMC: 11714411. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.101012.


Identifying thresholds of reaction for different foods.

Lieberman J J Food Allergy. 2024; 6(1):21-25.

PMID: 39257602 PMC: 11382767. DOI: 10.2500/jfa.2024.6.240006.


Simulated use of thresholds for precautionary allergen labeling: Impact on prevalence and risk.

Lizee K, Dominguez S, Theolier J, La Vieille S, Godefroy S Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e33316.

PMID: 39035549 PMC: 11259825. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33316.


Egg protein exposure estimation in risk assessment for Japanese food allergy labeling.

Akiyama H, Suzuki Y, Adachi R, Kadokura M, Takei A, Tomiki M Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e33545.

PMID: 39035498 PMC: 11259865. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33545.


References
1.
Blom W, Kruizinga A, Rubingh C, Remington B, Crevel R, Houben G . Assessing food allergy risks from residual peanut protein in highly refined vegetable oil. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017; 106(Pt A):306-313. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.05.072. View

2.
Taylor S, Crevel R, Sheffield D, Kabourek J, Baumert J . Threshold dose for peanut: risk characterization based upon published results from challenges of peanut-allergic individuals. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009; 47(6):1198-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.02.011. View

3.
Houben G, Burney P, Chan C, Crevel R, Dubois A, Faludi R . Prioritisation of allergenic foods with respect to public health relevance: Report from an ILSI Europe Food Allergy Task Force Expert Group. Food Chem Toxicol. 2016; 89:8-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.12.028. View

4.
Birot S, Madsen C, Kruizinga A, Crepet A, Christensen T, Brockhoff P . Food groups for allergen risk assessment: Combining food consumption data from different countries in Europe. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018; 118:371-381. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.05.042. View

5.
Madsen C, van den Dungen M, Cochrane S, Houben G, Knibb R, Knulst A . Can we define a level of protection for allergic consumers that everyone can accept?. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020; 117:104751. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104751. View