» Articles » PMID: 33138722

Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison of International Perioperative Care Protocols and Practices in 26 Countries

Abstract

Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a global surge in critically ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, some of whom may benefit from tracheostomy. Decisions on if, when, and how to perform tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 have major implications for patients, clinicians, and hospitals. We investigated the tracheostomy protocols and practices that institutions around the world have put into place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Data Sources: Protocols for tracheostomy in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection from individual institutions (n = 59) were obtained from the United States and 25 other countries, including data from several low- and middle-income countries, 23 published or society-endorsed protocols, and 36 institutional protocols.

Review Methods: The comparative document analysis involved cross-sectional review of institutional protocols and practices. Data sources were analyzed for timing of tracheostomy, contraindications, preoperative testing, personal protective equipment (PPE), surgical technique, and postoperative management.

Conclusions: Timing of tracheostomy varied from 3 to >21 days, with over 90% of protocols recommending 14 days of intubation prior to tracheostomy. Most protocols advocate delaying tracheostomy until COVID-19 testing was negative. All protocols involved use of N95 or higher PPE. Both open and percutaneous techniques were reported. Timing of tracheostomy changes ranged from 5 to >30 days postoperatively, sometimes contingent on negative COVID-19 test results.

Implications For Practice: Wide variation exists in tracheostomy protocols, reflecting geographical variation, different resource constraints, and limited data to drive evidence-based care standards. Findings presented herein may provide reference points and a framework for evolving care standards.

Citing Articles

Elevating Tracheostomy Care Through Data-Driven Innovation: What Can Education, Evidence-Based Practice, and Quality Improvement Learn from One Another?.

Brenner M, Pandian V Tracheostomy. 2024; 1(2):1-6.

PMID: 39188761 PMC: 11345906.


Outcomes for COVID-19 Patients Undergoing Tracheostomy With or Without Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO).

Asi K, Gorelik D, Syed T, Thekdi A, Yiu Y Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e55750.

PMID: 38586787 PMC: 10998924. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55750.


Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Szafran A, Dahms K, Ansems K, Skoetz N, Monsef I, Breuer T Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 11:CD015532.

PMID: 37982427 PMC: 10658650. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015532.


Improving airway management and tracheostomy care through interprofessional collaboration: aligning timing, technique, and teamwork.

Pandian V, Atkins J, Freeman-Sanderson A, Prush N, Feller-Kopman D, McGrath B J Thorac Dis. 2023; 15(5):2363-2370.

PMID: 37324074 PMC: 10267926. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-205.


Lessons Learned in Mechanical Ventilation/Oxygen Support in Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Dragoi L, Siuba M, Fan E Clin Chest Med. 2023; 44(2):321-333.

PMID: 37085222 PMC: 9678831. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2022.11.010.