Noise Reduction in CT Images Using a Selective Mean Filter

Overview

Journal J Biomed Phys Eng

Publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2020 Nov 2

PMID 33134222

Citations 5

Authors

Anam C

Adi K

Sutanto H

Arifin Z

Budi W S

Fujibuchi T

Dougherty G

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Noise reduction is a method for reducing CT dose; however, it can reduce image quality.

Objective: This study aims to propose a selective mean filter (SMF) and evaluate its effectiveness for noise suppression in CT images.

Material And Methods: This experimental study proposed and implemented the new noise reduction algorithm. The proposed algorithm is based on a mean filter (MF), but the calculation of the mean pixel value using the neighboring pixels in a kernel selectively applied a threshold value based on the noise of the image. The SMF method was evaluated using images of phantoms. The dose reduction was estimated by comparing the image noise acquired with a lower dose after implementing the SMF method and the noise in the original image acquired with a higher dose. For comparison, the images were also filtered with an adaptive mean filter (AMF) and a bilateral filter (BF).

Results: The spatial resolution of the image filtered with the SMF was similar to the original images and the images filtered with the BF. While using the AMF, spatial resolution was significantly corrupted. The noise reduction achieved using the SMF was up to 75%, while it was up to 50% using the BF.

Conclusion: SMF significantly reduces the noise and preserves the spatial resolution of the image. The noise reduction was more pronounced with BF, and less pronounced with AMF.

Citing Articles

LightGBM is an Effective Predictive Model for Postoperative Complications in Gastric Cancer: A Study Integrating Radiomics with Ensemble Learning.

Wang W, Sheng R, Liao S, Wu Z, Wang L, Liu C J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; 37(6):3034-3048.

PMID: 38940888 PMC: 11612084. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01172-0.

Ensemble classification of integrated CT scan datasets in detecting COVID-19 using feature fusion from contourlet transform and CNN.

Nur-A-Alam M, Nasir M, Ahsan M, Based M, Haider J, Kowalski M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20063.

PMID: 37973820 PMC: 10654719. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47183-9.

Automated development of the contrast-detail curve based on statistical low-contrast detectability in CT images.

Anam C, Naufal A, Fujibuchi T, Matsubara K, Dougherty G J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23(9):e13719.

PMID: 35808971 PMC: 9512356. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13719.

Elimination of biological and physical artifacts in abdomen and brain computed tomography procedures using filtering techniques.

Omer H, Tamam N, Alameen S, Algadi S, Tai D, Sulieman A Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022; 29(4):2180-2186.

PMID: 35531247 PMC: 9073048. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.11.043.

Effect Evaluation of Platelet-Rich Plasma Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage on Serum Inflammatory Factors in Patients with Pressure Ulcer by Intelligent Algorithm-Based CT Image.

Yang J, Xiao C, Wen H, Sun K, Wu X, Feng X Comput Math Methods Med. 2022; 2022:8916076.

PMID: 35281950 PMC: 8906978. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8916076.

References

Mazrani W, McHugh K, Marsden P . The radiation burden of radiological investigations. Arch Dis Child. 2007; 92(12):1127-31. PMC: 2066089. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.101782. View

Christianson O, Winslow J, Frush D, Samei E . Automated Technique to Measure Noise in Clinical CT Examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205(1):W93-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13613. View

Kalra M, Maher M, Sahani D, Blake M, Hahn P, Avinash G . Low-dose CT of the abdomen: evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters pilot study. Radiology. 2003; 228(1):251-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2281020693. View

Anam C, Arif I, Haryanto F, Lestari F, Widita R, Budi W . An Improved Method of Automated Noise Measurement System in CT Images. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2021; 11(2):163-174. PMC: 8064134. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1198. View

Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, Wolf H, Hothorn T, Kalender W . Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14(6):995-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2301-9. View

Kalender W . Dose in x-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2014; 59(3):R129-50. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/3/R129. View

Kamezawa H, Arimura H, Shirieda K, Kameda N, Ohki M . Feasibility of patient dose reduction based on various noise suppression filters for cone-beam computed tomography in an image-guided patient positioning system. Phys Med Biol. 2016; 61(9):3609-36. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/9/3609. View

McCollough C, Primak A, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J . Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009; 47(1):27-40. PMC: 2743386. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006. View

Al-Hinnawi A, Daear M, Huwaijah S . Assessment of bilateral filter on 1/2-dose chest-pelvis CT views. Radiol Phys Technol. 2013; 6(2):385-98. DOI: 10.1007/s12194-013-0212-7. View

10.

Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Budi W, Haryanto F, Dougherty G . An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018; 19(6):244-252. PMC: 6236841. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12476. View

11.

Kim C, Kim J . Realistic simulation of reduced-dose CT with noise modeling and sinogram synthesis using DICOM CT images. Med Phys. 2014; 41(1):011901. DOI: 10.1118/1.4830431. View

12.

Zhang M, Gunturk B . Multiresolution bilateral filtering for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2008; 17(12):2324-33. PMC: 2614560. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2008.2006658. View

13.

Coupe P, Yger P, Prima S, Hellier P, Kervrann C, Barillot C . An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008; 27(4):425-41. PMC: 2881565. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2007.906087. View

14.

Li Z, Yu L, Trzasko J, Lake D, Blezek D, Fletcher J . Adaptive nonlocal means filtering based on local noise level for CT denoising. Med Phys. 2014; 41(1):011908. DOI: 10.1118/1.4851635. View

15.

Huang W, Muo C, Lin C, Jen Y, Yang M, Lin J . Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: a nation-wide population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2014; 110(9):2354-60. PMC: 4007220. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.103. View

16.

Coupe P, Hellier P, Kervrann C, Barillot C . Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2009; 18(10):2221-9. PMC: 2784081. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2009.2024064. View

17.

Singh S, Kalra M, Ali Khawaja R, Padole A, Pourjabbar S, Lira D . Radiation dose optimization and thoracic computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013; 52(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2013.08.004. View

18.

Anam C, Budi W, Adi K, Sutanto H, Haryanto F, Ali M . Assessment of patient dose and noise level of clinical CT images: automated measurements. J Radiol Prot. 2019; 39(3):783-793. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab23cc. View

19.

Zhang H, Zeng D, Zhang H, Wang J, Liang Z, Ma J . Applications of nonlocal means algorithm in low-dose X-ray CT image processing and reconstruction: A review. Med Phys. 2017; 44(3):1168-1185. PMC: 5381744. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12097. View

20.

Bauhs J, Vrieze T, Primak A, Bruesewitz M, McCollough C . CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics. 2008; 28(1):245-53. DOI: 10.1148/rg.281075024. View