» Articles » PMID: 31117064

Assessment of Patient Dose and Noise Level of Clinical CT Images: Automated Measurements

Overview
Journal J Radiol Prot
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 May 23
PMID 31117064
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated comparisons between patient dose and noise in pelvic, abdominal, thoracic and head CT images using an automatic method. 113 patient images (37 pelvis, 34 abdominal, 25 thoracic, and 17 head examinations) were retrospectively and automatically examined in this study. Water-equivalent diameter (Dw), size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) and noise were automatically calculated from the center slice for every patient image. The Dw was calculated based on auto-contouring of the patients' edges, and the SSDE was calculated as the product of the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) extracted from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) header and the size conversion factor based on the Dw obtained from AAPM 204. The noise was automatically measured as a minimum standard deviation in the map of standard deviations. A square region of interest of about 1 cm was used in the automated noise measurement. The SSDE values for the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head were 21.8 ± 7.3 mGy, 22.0 ± 4.5 mGy, 21.5 ± 4.7 mGy, and 65.1 ± 1.7 mGy, respectively. The SSDEs for the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax increased linearly with increasing Dw, and for the head with constant tube current, the SSDE decreased with increasing Dw. The noise in the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head were 5.9 ± 1.5 HU, 5.2 ± 1.4 HU, 4.9 ± 0.8 HU and 3.9 ± 0.2 HU, respectively. The noise levels for the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax of the patients were relatively constant with Dw because of tube current modulation. The noise in the head image was also relatively constant because Dw variations in the head are very small. The automated approach provides a convenient and objective tool for dose optimizations.

Citing Articles

A Practical Method for Slice Spacing Measurement Using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Computed Tomography Performance Phantom.

Anam C, Naufal A, Dwihapsari Y, Fujibuchi T, Dougherty G J Med Phys. 2024; 49(1):103-109.

PMID: 38828077 PMC: 11141755. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_155_23.


Ensemble classification of integrated CT scan datasets in detecting COVID-19 using feature fusion from contourlet transform and CNN.

Nur-A-Alam M, Nasir M, Ahsan M, Based M, Haider J, Kowalski M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20063.

PMID: 37973820 PMC: 10654719. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47183-9.


Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms.

Anam C, Amilia R, Naufal A, Sutanto H, Dwihapsari Y, Fujibuchi T J Biomed Phys Eng. 2023; 13(4):353-362.

PMID: 37609515 PMC: 10440409. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2302-1599.


Deep Learning-Based Image Noise Quantification Framework for Computed Tomography.

Huber N, Kim J, Leng S, McCollough C, Yu L J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2023; 47(4):603-607.

PMID: 37380148 PMC: 10363183. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001469.


Impact of ROI Size on the Accuracy of Noise Measurement in CT on Computational and ACR Phantoms.

Anam C, Triadyaksa P, Naufal A, Arifin Z, Muhlisin Z, Setiawati E J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022; 12(4):359-368.

PMID: 36059282 PMC: 9395624. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2202-1457.