» Articles » PMID: 33126248

Sample-specific Perturbation of Gene Interactions Identifies Breast Cancer Subtypes

Overview
Journal Brief Bioinform
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Oct 30
PMID 33126248
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, and there are many forms of categorization for breast cancer based on gene expression profiles. Gene expression profiles are variables and may show differences if measured at different time points or under different conditions. In contrast, biological networks are relatively stable over time and under different conditions. In this study, we used a gene interaction network from a new point of view to explore the subtypes of breast cancer based on individual-specific edge perturbations measured by relative gene expression value. Our study reveals that there are four breast cancer subtypes based on gene interaction perturbations at the individual level. The new network-based subtypes of breast cancer show strong heterogeneity in prognosis, somatic mutations, phenotypic changes and enriched pathways. The network-based subtypes are closely related to the PAM50 subtypes and immunohistochemistry index. This work helps us to better understand the heterogeneity and mechanisms of breast cancer from a network perspective.

Citing Articles

Immune-related interaction perturbation networks unravel biological peculiars and clinical significance of glioblastoma.

Liu Z, Xu Y, Wang Y, Weng S, Xu H, Ren Y Imeta. 2024; 2(3):e127.

PMID: 38867932 PMC: 10989959. DOI: 10.1002/imt2.127.


Using single-sample networks to identify the contrasting patterns of gene interactions and reveal the radiation dose-dependent effects in multiple tissues of spaceflight mice.

Zhang Y, Zhao L, Sun Y NPJ Microgravity. 2024; 10(1):45.

PMID: 38575629 PMC: 10995210. DOI: 10.1038/s41526-024-00383-7.


Evaluation of single-sample network inference methods for precision oncology.

Deschildre J, Vandemoortele B, Loers J, De Preter K, Vermeirssen V NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024; 10(1):18.

PMID: 38360881 PMC: 10869342. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00340-w.


Selective enhanced cytotoxicity of amino acid deprivation for cancer therapy using thermozyme functionalized nanocatalyst.

Tang X, Zhang L, Huang M, Wang F, Xie G, Huo R J Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22(1):53.

PMID: 38326899 PMC: 10848425. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-024-02326-6.


Patient-specific analysis of co-expression to measure biological network rewiring in individuals.

Wei L, Xin Y, Pu M, Zhang Y Life Sci Alliance. 2023; 7(2).

PMID: 37977656 PMC: 10656351. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202302253.


References
1.
DAssoro A, Leontovich A, Amato A, Ayers-Ringler J, Quatraro C, Hafner K . Abrogation of p53 function leads to metastatic transcriptome networks that typify tumor progression in human breast cancer xenografts. Int J Oncol. 2010; 37(5):1167-76. PMC: 4312700. DOI: 10.3892/ijo_00000768. View

2.
Joshi H, Bhanot G, Borresen-Dale A, Kristensen V . Potential tumorigenic programs associated with TP53 mutation status reveal role of VEGF pathway. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107(10):1722-8. PMC: 3493873. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.461. View

3.
Guo Z, Zhang T, Li X, Wang Q, Xu J, Yu H . Towards precise classification of cancers based on robust gene functional expression profiles. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6:58. PMC: 1274255. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-58. View

4.
Aas T, Borresen A, Geisler S, Smith-Sorensen B, Johnsen H, Varhaug J . Specific P53 mutations are associated with de novo resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer patients. Nat Med. 1996; 2(7):811-4. DOI: 10.1038/nm0796-811. View

5.
Kapp A, Tibshirani R . Are clusters found in one dataset present in another dataset?. Biostatistics. 2006; 8(1):9-31. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj029. View