» Articles » PMID: 33123025

Dynamic Arterial Elastance During Experimental Endotoxic Septic Shock: A Potential Marker of Cardiovascular Efficiency

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2020 Oct 30
PMID 33123025
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dynamic arterial elastance (Ea), the ratio between pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), has been suggested as a dynamic parameter relating pressure and flow. We aimed to determine the effects of endotoxic septic shock and hemodynamic resuscitation on Ea in an experimental study in 18 New Zealand rabbits. Animals received placebo (SHAM, = 6) or intravenous lipopolysaccharide (E. Coli 055:B5, 1 mg⋅kg ) with or without (EDX-R, = 6; EDX, = 6) hemodynamic resuscitation (fluid bolus of 20 ml⋅kg and norepinephrine for restoring mean arterial pressure). Continuous arterial pressure and aortic blood flow measurements were obtained simultaneously. Cardiovascular efficiency was evaluated by the oscillatory power fraction [%Osc: oscillatory work/left ventricular (LV) total work] and the energy efficiency ratio (EER = LV total work/cardiac output). Ea increased in septic animals (from 0.73 to 1.70; = 0.012) and dropped after hemodynamic resuscitation. Ea was related with the %Osc and EER [estimates: -0.101 (-0.137 to -0.064) and -9.494 (-11.964 to -7.024); < 0.001, respectively]. So, the higher the Ea the better the cardiovascular efficiency (lower %Osc and EER). Sepsis resulted in a reduced %Osc and EER, reflecting a better cardiovascular efficiency that was tracked by Ea. Ea could be a potential index of cardiovascular efficiency during septic shock.

Citing Articles

Blood pressure response index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a multicenter cohort study.

Chen Y, Jiang H, Wei Y, Qiu Y, Su L, Chen J EBioMedicine. 2024; 106:105257.

PMID: 39059317 PMC: 11338059. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105257.


Predictive value of dynamic arterial elastance for vasopressor withdrawal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alvarado-Sanchez J, Salazar-Ruiz S, Caicedo-Ruiz J, Diaztagle-Fernandez J, Cardenas-Bolivar Y, Carreno-Hernandez F Ann Intensive Care. 2024; 14(1):108.

PMID: 38980442 PMC: 11233481. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01345-8.


Dynamic Arterial Elastance During Experimental Endotoxic Septic Shock: A Potential Marker of Cardiovascular Efficiency.

Monge Garcia M, Guijo Gonzalez P, Saludes Orduna P, Gracia Romero M, Gil Cano A, Messina A Front Physiol. 2020; 11:562824.

PMID: 33123025 PMC: 7567029. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.562824.

References
1.
Pinsky M, Guarracino F . How to assess ventriculoarterial coupling in sepsis. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020; 26(3):313-318. PMC: 9410357. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000721. View

2.
de Courson H, Boyer P, Grobost R, Lanchon R, Sesay M, Nouette-Gaulain K . Changes in dynamic arterial elastance induced by volume expansion and vasopressor in the operating room: a prospective bicentre study. Ann Intensive Care. 2019; 9(1):117. PMC: 6787125. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-019-0588-6. View

3.
Monge Garcia M, Jian Z, Hatib F, Settels J, Cecconi M, Pinsky M . Dynamic Arterial Elastance as a Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling Index: An Experimental Animal Study. Front Physiol. 2020; 11:284. PMC: 7153496. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00284. View

4.
Berger D, Li J, Noordergraaf A . Arterial wave propagation phenomena, ventricular work, and power dissipation. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995; 23(6):804-11. DOI: 10.1007/BF02584479. View

5.
Monge Garcia M, Gracia Romero M, Gil Cano A, Aya H, Rhodes A, Grounds R . Dynamic arterial elastance as a predictor of arterial pressure response to fluid administration: a validation study. Crit Care. 2014; 18(6):626. PMC: 4271484. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-014-0626-6. View