» Articles » PMID: 33109172

User Fee Policies and Women's Empowerment: a Systematic Scoping Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Oct 28
PMID 33109172
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over the past decade, an increasing number of low- and middle-income countries have reduced or removed user fees for pregnant women and/or children under five as a strategy to achieve universal health coverage. Despite the large number of studies (including meta-analyses and systematic reviews) that have shown this strategy's positive effects impact on health-related indicators, the repercussions on women's empowerment or gender equality has been overlooked in the literature. The aim of this study is to systematically review the evidence on the association between user fee policies in low- and middle-income countries and women's empowerment.

Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted. Two reviewers conducted the database search in six health-focused databases (Pubmed, CAB Abstracts, Embase, Medline, Global Health, EBM Reviews) using English key words. The database search was conducted on February 20, 2020, with no publication date limitation. Qualitative analysis of the included articles was conducted using a thematic analysis approach. The material was organized based on the Gender at Work analytical framework.

Results: Out of the 206 initial records, nine articles were included in the review. The study settings include three low-income countries (Burkina Faso, Mali, Sierra Leone) and two lower-middle countries (Kenya, India). Four of them examine a direct association between user fee policies and women's empowerment, while the others address this issue indirectly -mostly by examining gender equality or women's decision-making in the context of free healthcare. The evidence suggests that user fee removal contributes to improving women's capability to make health decisions through different mechanisms, but that the impact is limited. In the context of free healthcare, women's healthcare decision-making power remains undermined because of social norms that are prevalent in the household, the community and the healthcare centers. In addition, women continue to endure limited access to and control over resources (mainly education, information and economic resources).

Conclusion: User fee removal policies alone are not enough to improve women's healthcare decision-making power. Comprehensive and multi-sectoral approaches are needed to bring sustainable change regarding women's empowerment. A focus on "gender equitable access to healthcare" is needed to reconcile women's empowerment and the efforts to achieve universal health coverage.

Citing Articles

Does abolishing user fees for family planning increase contraception use? An impact evaluation of the national policy in Burkina Faso.

Tiendrebeogo C, Joseph V, Bicaba F, Bila A, Bicaba A, Druetz T J Glob Health. 2022; 12:04086.

PMID: 36227754 PMC: 9559360. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.04086.


Examining vulnerability and resilience in maternal, newborn and child health through a gender lens in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Sule F, Uthman O, Olamijuwon E, Ichegbo N, Mgbachi I, Okusanya B BMJ Glob Health. 2022; 7(4).

PMID: 35443936 PMC: 9024279. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007426.


Using experience to create evidence: a mixed methods process evaluation of the new free family planning policy in Burkina Faso.

Browne L, Cooper S, Tiendrebeogo C, Bicaba F, Bila A, Bicaba A Reprod Health. 2022; 19(1):67.

PMID: 35303898 PMC: 8932047. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01375-0.


Free healthcare for some, fee-paying for the rest: adaptive practices and ethical issues in rural communities in the district of Boulsa, Burkina Faso.

Druetz T, Bila A, Bicaba F, Tiendrebeogo C, Bicaba A Glob Bioeth. 2021; 32(1):100-115.

PMID: 34408385 PMC: 8366671. DOI: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1966974.


Women's decision-making power in a context of free reproductive healthcare and family planning in rural Burkina Faso.

Beaujoin C, Bila A, Bicaba F, Plouffe V, Bicaba A, Druetz T BMC Womens Health. 2021; 21(1):272.

PMID: 34294057 PMC: 8296726. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01411-4.

References
1.
Kruk M, Mbaruku G, Rockers P, Galea S . User fee exemptions are not enough: out-of-pocket payments for 'free' delivery services in rural Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2008; 13(12):1442-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02173.x. View

2.
Murray S, Hunter B, Bisht R, Ensor T, Bick D . Effects of demand-side financing on utilisation, experiences and outcomes of maternity care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:30. PMC: 3897964. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-30. View

3.
Johri M, Ridde V, Heinmuller R, Haddad S . Estimation of maternal and child mortality one year after user-fee elimination: an impact evaluation and modelling study in Burkina Faso. Bull World Health Organ. 2014; 92(10):706-15. PMC: 4208477. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.13.130609. View

4.
Druetz T, Bicaba A, Some T, Kouanda S, Ly A, Haddad S . Effect of interrupting free healthcare for children: Drawing lessons at the critical moment of national scale-up in Burkina Faso. Soc Sci Med. 2017; 185:46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.040. View

5.
Treacy L, Bolkan H, Sagbakken M . Distance, accessibility and costs. Decision-making during childbirth in rural Sierra Leone: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0188280. PMC: 5819763. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188280. View