» Articles » PMID: 33096931

The Effects of Epistemic Trust and Social Trust on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: An Empirical Study from China

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Oct 24
PMID 33096931
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most studies exploring the public acceptance of genetically modified food (GMF) are based on social trust and the establishment of a causal model. The underlying premise is that social trust indirectly affects public acceptance of GMF through perceived risks and perceived benefits. The object of social trust is trust in people, organizations, and institutions. Different from the social trust, epistemic trust refers to people's trust in scientific knowledge behind the technology of concern. It has been shown that epistemic trust, like social trust, is also an important factor that affects the public perception of applicable risks and benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to incorporate epistemic trust into the causal model to derive a more complete explanation of public acceptance. However, such work has not been conducted to date. The causal model proposed in this paper integrated epistemic trust and social trust and divided social trust into trust in public organizations and trust in industrial organizations. A representative questionnaire survey (N = 1091) was conducted with Chinese adults. The model was analyzed by the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. Three major findings were obtained: First, epistemic trust is an important antecedent of perceived risks and perceived benefits and exerts a significant indirect effect on the acceptance of GMF. Secondly, trust in industrial organizations negatively impacts perceived risks, while trust in public organizations positively impacts perceived benefits. Thirdly, contrary to the common opinion, trust in industrial organizations did not exert a significant direct effect on perceived benefits, and trust in public organizations did not demonstrate a significant direct effect on perceived risks. Therefore, trust in industrial organizations and trust in public organizations utilize different influence paths on GMF acceptance. This study enriches the understanding of the influence path of trust with regard to the acceptance of emerging technologies and is of great significance to relevant risk-management practices.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Trust on Chinese Consumers' Acceptance of Meat Substitutes: The Mediating Role of Perceived Benefits and Perceived Risks, and the Moderating Role of Consumer Knowledge.

Pareti M, Guo J, Abudurofu N, Liu Q, Bulibuli A, Canavari M Foods. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40002113 PMC: 11854322. DOI: 10.3390/foods14040669.


The role of epistemic trust and epistemic disruption in vaccine hesitancy, conspiracy thinking and the capacity to identify fake news.

Tanzer M, Campbell C, Saunders R, Booker T, Luyten P, Fonagy P PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(12):e0003941.

PMID: 39630644 PMC: 11616851. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003941.


Impacts of knowledge and trust on consumer perceptions and purchase intentions towards genetically modified foods.

Ngo T, Phan T, Le T PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0311257.

PMID: 39356695 PMC: 11446447. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311257.


Is AI Food a Gimmick or the Future Direction of Food Production?-Predicting Consumers' Willingness to Buy AI Food Based on Cognitive Trust and Affective Trust.

Xia T, Shen X, Li L Foods. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39335911 PMC: 11431241. DOI: 10.3390/foods13182983.


Guidance on risk-benefit assessment of foods.

More S, Benford D, Bennekou S, Bampidis V, Bragard C, Halldorsson T EFSA J. 2024; 22(7):e8875.

PMID: 39015302 PMC: 11250173. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8875.


References
1.
Xu R, Wu Y, Luan J . Consumer-perceived risks of genetically modified food in China. Appetite. 2019; 147:104520. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104520. View

2.
Capon A, Gillespie J, Rolfe M, Smith W . Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:424. PMC: 4417265. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1795-1. View

3.
Maeda Y, Miyahara M . Determinants of trust in industry, government, and citizen's groups in Japan. Risk Anal. 2003; 23(2):303-10. DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00310. View

4.
Marques M, Critchley C, Walshe J . Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support. Public Underst Sci. 2014; 24(5):601-18. DOI: 10.1177/0963662514542372. View

5.
Xiao Q, Liu H, Feldman M . How does trust affect acceptance of a nuclear power plant (NPP): A survey among people living with Qinshan NPP in China. PLoS One. 2017; 12(11):e0187941. PMC: 5703464. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187941. View