Experimental Model of Congestive Heart Failure Induced by Transverse Aortic Constriction in BALB/c Mice
Overview
Toxicology
Affiliations
Introduction: Murine transverse aortic constriction (TAC) is a frequently used model of pressure overload-induced left ventricular (LV) remodeling. However, there is considerable variability in disease progression to overt heart failure (HF) development in the most commonly used strain of mice (i.e., C57BL/6J). Studies have shown that C57BL/6J mice are more resistant than BALB/c mice to congestive HF development following myocardial infarction or angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that BALB/c mice may be a better research model to study TAC-induced progressive HF.
Methods: Following sham or TAC surgery in both C57BL/6J (n = 29) and BALB/c (n = 32) mice, we evaluated cardiac dimensions and function by echocardiography at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks and monitored survival throughout the study. In a separate cohort of BALB/c mice, we repeated the study in the presence of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril or a vehicle initiated 2 weeks post-TAC and administered for 6 weeks. At the end of the studies, we assessed the heart weight, lung weight, and plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration.
Results: Following comparable TAC, both C57BL/6J and BALB/c mice showed significant LV remodeling compared with the sham control mice. BALB/c mice progressively developed systolic dysfunction, LV dilation, lung congestion, and significant mortality, whereas C57BL/6J mice did not. In the separate cohort of BALB/c TAC mice, enalapril significantly reduced the heart weight, lung weight, and plasma BNP concentration and improved survival compared with the vehicle control.
Discussion: BALB/c mice uniformly developed congestive HF post-TAC. Enalapril was effective in improving survival and reducing lung congestion in this model. The data suggest that BALB/c mice may be a better research tool than C57BL/6J mice to study TAC-induced disease progression to HF and to evaluate novel therapies for the treatment of chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction.
Zhang Z, Zhang X, Yang Y, Wang H, Yang X, Xuan L Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2025; 39:3946320251315800.
PMID: 39895092 PMC: 11789120. DOI: 10.1177/03946320251315800.
The Extracellular Matrix and Cardiac Pressure Overload: Focus on Novel Treatment Targets.
Snelders M, Yildirim M, Danser A, van der Pluijm I, Essers J Cells. 2024; 13(20.
PMID: 39451203 PMC: 11505996. DOI: 10.3390/cells13201685.
Exploring in vivo and in vitro models for heart failure with biomarker insights: a review.
Prajapati A, Shah G Egypt Heart J. 2024; 76(1):141.
PMID: 39432214 PMC: 11493927. DOI: 10.1186/s43044-024-00568-1.
Comparison of mouse models of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Sayour N, Gergely T, Varadi B, Toth V, Agg B, Kovacs T ESC Heart Fail. 2024; 12(1):87-100.
PMID: 39243187 PMC: 11769617. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.15031.
The immunology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Smart C, Madhur M Clin Sci (Lond). 2023; 137(16):1225-1247.
PMID: 37606086 PMC: 10959189. DOI: 10.1042/CS20230226.