» Articles » PMID: 33093161

Prostate Cancer Biomarker Development: National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network Prostate Cancer Collaborative Group Review

Overview
Date 2020 Oct 23
PMID 33093161
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prostate cancer remains the most common non-skin cancer and second leading cause of death among men in the United States. Although progress has been made in diagnosis and risk assessment, many clinical questions remain regarding early identification of prostate cancer and management. The early detection of aggressive disease continues to provide high curative rates if diagnosed in a localized state. Unfortunately, prostate cancer displays significant heterogeneity within the prostate organ and between individual patients making detection and treatment strategies complex. Although prostate cancer is common among men, the majority will not die from prostate cancer, introducing the issue of overtreatment as a major concern in clinical management of the disease. The focus of the future is to identify those at highest risk for aggressive prostate cancer and to develop prevention and screening strategies, as well as discerning the difference in malignant potential of diagnosed tumors. The Prostate Cancer Research Group of the National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network has contributed to the progress in addressing these concerns. This summary is an overview of the activities of the group.

Citing Articles

Plasma metabolomics profiling of 580 patients from an Early Detection Research Network prostate cancer cohort.

Benedetti E, Chetnik K, Flynn T, Barbieri C, Scherr D, Loda M Sci Data. 2023; 10(1):830.

PMID: 38007532 PMC: 10676366. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02750-7.


Covariate-specific evaluation of continuous biomarker.

Li Z, Huang Y, Patil D, Rubin M, Sanda M Stat Med. 2023; 42(7):953-969.

PMID: 36600184 PMC: 10071998. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9652.


Improving the detection of aggressive prostate cancer using immunohistochemical staining of protein marker panels.

Li Q, Lih T, Wang Y, Hu Y, Hoti N, Chan D Am J Cancer Res. 2022; 12(3):1323-1336.

PMID: 35411226 PMC: 8984898.


Proteomic characterization of primary and metastatic prostate cancer reveals reduced proteinase activity in aggressive tumors.

Li Q, Chen J, Hu Y, Hoti N, Lih T, Thomas S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):18936.

PMID: 34556748 PMC: 8460832. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98410-0.


The Etiology and Pathophysiology Genesis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer: A New Perspective.

Phua T Medicines (Basel). 2021; 8(6).

PMID: 34208086 PMC: 8230771. DOI: 10.3390/medicines8060030.


References
1.
de la Calle C, Patil D, Wei J, Scherr D, Sokoll L, Chan D . Multicenter Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naïve Men. J Urol. 2015; 194(1):65-72. PMC: 4696043. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091. View

2.
Baldisserotto M, Neto E, Carvalhal G, de Toledo A, de Almeida C, Cairoli C . Validation of PI-RADS v.2 for prostate cancer diagnosis with MRI at 3T using an external phased-array coil. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 44(5):1354-1359. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25284. View

3.
Jhaveri F, Klein E, Kupelian P, Zippe C, Levin H . Declining rates of extracapsular extension after radical prostatectomy: evidence for continued stage migration. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(10):3167-72. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3167. View

4.
Beauval J, Ploussard G, Soulie M, Pfister C, Van Agt S, Vincendeau S . Pathologic findings in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients eligible for active surveillance with highly selective criteria: a multicenter study. Urology. 2012; 80(3):656-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.051. View

5.
Bussemakers M, van Bokhoven A, Verhaegh G, Smit F, Karthaus H, Schalken J . DD3: a new prostate-specific gene, highly overexpressed in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1999; 59(23):5975-9. View