» Articles » PMID: 33091378

Manipulation of the Endocochlear Potential Reveals Two Distinct Types of Cochlear Nonlinearity

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2020 Oct 22
PMID 33091378
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mammalian hearing organ, the cochlea, contains an active amplifier to boost the vibrational response to low level sounds. Hallmarks of this active process are sharp location-dependent frequency tuning and compressive nonlinearity over a wide stimulus range. The amplifier relies on outer hair cell (OHC)-generated forces driven in part by the endocochlear potential, the ∼+80 mV potential maintained in scala media, generated by the stria vascularis. We transiently eliminated the endocochlear potential in vivo by an intravenous injection of furosemide and measured the vibrations of different layers in the cochlea's organ of Corti using optical coherence tomography. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions were also monitored. After furosemide injection, the vibrations of the basilar membrane lost the best frequency (BF) peak and showed broad tuning similar to a passive cochlea. The intra-organ of Corti vibrations measured in the region of the OHCs lost the BF peak and showed low-pass responses but retained nonlinearity. This strongly suggests that OHC electromotility was operating and being driven by nonlinear OHC current. Thus, although electromotility is presumably necessary to produce a healthy BF peak, the mere presence of electromotility is not sufficient. The BF peak recovered nearly fully within 2 h, along with the recovery of odd-order distortion product otoacoustic emissions. The recovery pattern suggests that physical shifts in operating condition are a critical step in the recovery process.

Citing Articles

The spatial buildup of nonlinear compression in the cochlea.

Kondylidis K, Vavakou A, van der Heijden M Front Cell Neurosci. 2025; 18:1450115.

PMID: 39944221 PMC: 11814186. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1450115.


The Reduced Cortilymph Flow Path in the Short-Wave Region Allows Outer Hair Cells to Produce Focused Traveling-Wave Amplification.

Guinan Jr J, Cho N, Puria S J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2025; 26(1):49-61.

PMID: 39920422 PMC: 11861466. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-025-00976-3.


Narrow elliptical motion at the outer hair cell-Deiters' cell junction explains disparate features of uniaxial displacement measurements.

Frost B, Strimbu C, Olson E Hear Res. 2025; 458:109189.

PMID: 39869993 PMC: 11904828. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109189.


Tonic sound-evoked motility of cochlear outer hair cells in mice with impaired mechanotransduction.

Dewey J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763721 PMC: 11702648. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.19.629412.


Low-side and multitone suppression in the base of the gerbil cochlea.

Strimbu C, Olson E Biophys J. 2024; 124(2):297-315.

PMID: 39639771 PMC: 11788482. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.004.


References
1.
Wang Y, Fallah E, Olson E . Adaptation of Cochlear Amplification to Low Endocochlear Potential. Biophys J. 2019; 116(9):1769-1786. PMC: 6506630. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.03.020. View

2.
Strimbu C, Prasad S, Hakizimana P, Fridberger A . Control of hearing sensitivity by tectorial membrane calcium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(12):5756-5764. PMC: 6431213. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805223116. View

3.
Mills D, Norton S, Rubel E . Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993; 94(4):2108-22. DOI: 10.1121/1.407483. View

4.
Ren T, He W, Kemp D . Reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations in living mouse cochleae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(35):9910-5. PMC: 5024575. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1607428113. View

5.
Freeman D, Masaki K, McAllister A, Wei J, Weiss T . Static material properties of the tectorial membrane: a summary. Hear Res. 2003; 180(1-2):11-27. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00072-8. View