» Articles » PMID: 33081697

Lesion Outline and Thermal Field Distribution of Ablative in Vitro Experiments in Myocardia: Comparison of Radiofrequency and Laser Ablation

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Oct 21
PMID 33081697
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To explore the lesion outline and thermal field distribution of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA) in myocardial ablation in vitro.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-four fresh porcine hearts were ablated with RFA or LA in vitro. The radiofrequency electrode or laser fiber and two parallel thermocouple probes were inserted into the myocardium under ultrasound guidance. The output power for RFA was 20 W/s and for LA was 5 W/s, and the total thermal energies were 1200 J, 2400 J, 3600 J, and 4800 J. The range of ablation lesions was measured, and temperature data were recorded simultaneously.

Results: All coagulation zones were ellipsoidal with clear boundaries. The center of LA was carbonized more obviously than that of RFA. With the accumulation of thermal energy and the extended time, all the ablation lesions induced by both RFA and LA were enlarged. By comparing the increase in thermal energy between the two groups, both the short-axis diameter and the volume change showed significant differences between the 1200 J and 3600 J groups and between the 2400 J and 4800 J groups (all P < 0.05). Both the short-axis diameter and the volume of the coagulation necrosis zone formed by LA were always larger than those of RFA at the same accumulated thermal energy. The temperatures of the two thermocouple probes increased with each energy increment. At the same accumulated energy, the temperature of LA was much higher than that of RFA at the same point. The initial temperature increase at 0.5 cm of LA was rapid. The temperature reached 43 °C and the accumulated energy reached 1200 J after approximately 4 min. After that the temperature increased at a slower rate to 70  C. For the RFA at the point of 0.5 cm, the initial temperature increased rapidly to 30 °C with the same accumulated energy of 1200 J after only 1 min. In the range of 4800 J of accumulated thermal energy, only the temperature of LA at the point of 0.5 cm exceeded 60 °C when the energy reached approximately 3000 J.

Conclusions: Both RFA and LA were shown to be reliable methods for myocardial ablation. The lesion outline and thermal field distribution of RFA and LA should be considered when performing thermal ablation in the intramyocardial septum during hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Citing Articles

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Interstitial Laser Ablation Using a Cylindrical Laser Diffuser: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Lee J, Seo Y, Truong V, Jeong H, Lim J, Lim S Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11).

PMID: 36428465 PMC: 9687491. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112895.

References
1.
Cesareo R, Pacella C, Pasqualini V, Campagna G, Iozzino M, Gallo A . Laser Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Benign Non-Functioning Thyroid Nodules: Six-Month Results of a Randomized, Parallel, Open-Label, Trial (LARA Trial). Thyroid. 2020; 30(6):847-856. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2019.0660. View

2.
Benoist S, Nordlinger B . Radiofrequency ablation in liver tumours. Ann Oncol. 2004; 15 Suppl 4:iv313-7. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh945. View

3.
Ball W, Ivanov J, Rakowski H, Wigle E, Linghorne M, Ralph-Edwards A . Long-term survival in patients with resting obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy comparison of conservative versus invasive treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(22):2313-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.040. View

4.
Di Costanzo G, Tortora R, DAdamo G, De Luca M, Lampasi F, Addario L . Radiofrequency ablation versus laser ablation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: a randomized trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 30(3):559-65. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12791. View

5.
Paravastu S, Horne M, Dodd P . Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 11:CD010878. PMC: 6464398. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010878.pub2. View