» Articles » PMID: 36428465

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Interstitial Laser Ablation Using a Cylindrical Laser Diffuser: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2022 Nov 26
PMID 36428465
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Local ablative treatment is another option for improving outcomes and has been evaluated for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. We previously suggested endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided interstitial laser ablation using a cylindrical laser diffuser (CILA) might be a feasible therapeutic option based on experiments performed on pancreatic cancer cell lines and porcine model with a short follow-up (3 days). The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of EUS-CILA performed using optimal settings in porcine pancreas with a long-term follow-up (2 weeks).

Methods: EUS-CILA (laser energy of 450 J; 5 W for 90 s) was applied to normal pancreatic tissue in porcine ( = 5) under EUS guidance. Animals were observed clinically for 2 weeks after EUS-CILA to evaluate complications. Computed tomography and laboratory tests were carried out to evaluate safety. Two weeks after EUS-CILA, all pigs were sacrificed, and histopathological safety and efficacy evaluations were conducted.

Results: EUS-CILA was technically successful in all five cases. No major complications occurred during the follow-up period. Body weight of porcine did not change during the study period without any significant change in feed intake. Animals remained in excellent condition throughout the experimental period, and laboratory tests and computed tomography (CT) scans provided no evidence of a major complication. Histopathological evaluation showed complete ablation in the ablated area with clear delineation of surrounding normal pancreatic tissue. Mean ablated volume was 55.5 mm × 29.0 mm and mean ablated areas in the pancreatic sections of the five pigs were not significantly different ( = 0.368).

Conclusions: In conclusion, our experimental study suggests that EUS-CILA is safe and has the potential to be an effective local treatment modality. No major morbidity or mortality occurred during the study period. Further evaluations are warranted before clinical application.

Citing Articles

Perioperative treatment with cilostazol reverses steatosis and improves liver regeneration after major hepatectomy in a steatotic rat model.

Hollander S, von Heesen M, Gabelein G, Mercier J, Laschke M, Menger M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2753.

PMID: 39843785 PMC: 11754906. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87135-z.


Comparative efficacies and safeties of cylindrical interstitial laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation on swine pancreas.

Lee J, Lim J, Seo Y, Truong V, Jeong H, Lim S Lasers Med Sci. 2024; 39(1):40.

PMID: 38240855 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-024-03989-1.

References
1.
Huguet F, Girard N, Guerche C, Hennequin C, Mornex F, Azria D . Chemoradiotherapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a qualitative systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(13):2269-77. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.7921. View

2.
Truong V, Jeong S, Park J, Tran V, Kim S, Lee D . Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided cylindrical interstitial laser ablation (CILA) on porcine pancreas. Biomed Opt Express. 2021; 12(7):4423-4437. PMC: 8367258. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.427379. View

3.
Di Matteo F, Martino M, Rea R, Pandolfi M, Rabitti C, Masselli G . EUS-guided Nd:YAG laser ablation of normal pancreatic tissue: a pilot study in a pig model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72(2):358-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.027. View

4.
Cazacu I, Singh B, Saftoiu A, Bhutani M . Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020; 22(6):27. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00767-1. View

5.
Schena E, Saccomandi P, Fong Y . Laser Ablation for Cancer: Past, Present and Future. J Funct Biomater. 2017; 8(2). PMC: 5492000. DOI: 10.3390/jfb8020019. View