Rate of True Recurrent Implantation Failure is Low: Results of Three Successive Frozen Euploid Single Embryo Transfers
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To study the true prevalence of recurrent implantation failure.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: A private assisted reproductive technology center.
Patient(s): Women (n = 4,429) with anatomically normal uterus who underwent up to three consecutive frozen euploid single embryo transfers (FE-SETs) were included in the study. Cycles with donor eggs or gestational carriers were excluded.
Intervention(s): None.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Cumulative outcomes from these cycles were analyzed. A logistic regression model was used to assess the differences of outcomes between first, second, and third FE-SET and a Kaplan-Meier curve as used to analyze cumulative implantation rate.
Result(s): The mean age of the patients included in the study was of 35.4 years. The sustained implantation rates of the first, second, and third FE-SET were 69.9%, 59.8%, and 60.3% per transfer, respectively. The cumulative sustained implantation rate after up to three consecutive FE-SET was 95.2%. The live birth rates after the first, second, and third FE-SET were 64.8%, 54.4%, and 54.1% per transfer, respectively. The cumulative live birth rate after up to three consecutive FE-SET was 92.6%. The miscarriage rate after observing a positive heartbeat was not different between the first (7.2%), second (8.8%), and third (12.7%) FE-SET.
Conclusion(s): Our findings suggest that true recurrent implantation failure is rare. For those patients with the ability to make euploid blastocysts, <5% would fail to achieve a clinical pregnancy with three embryos transferred. It remains to be further investigated whether this threshold identifies a truly recalcitrant group or simply a statistical certainty based on random variation.
Jiang L, Wen L, Lv X, Tang N, Yuan Y J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .
PMID: 40035946 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03436-2.
Roberts L, Herlihy N, Reig A, Titus S, Garcia-Milian R, Knight J Aging (Albany NY). 2025; 17(2):431-447.
PMID: 39976580 PMC: 11892918. DOI: 10.18632/aging.206202.
Embryo versus endometrial receptivity: untangling a complex debate.
Mercan R, Guzel Y, Usta I, Alper E Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 16:1537847.
PMID: 39911920 PMC: 11797072. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1537847.
Zhou Y, Liu L, Yang H, Lai Y, Gan D, Yang J PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0316028.
PMID: 39899518 PMC: 11790133. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316028.
Factors influencing endometrial receptivity in women with recurrent implantation failure.
Opuchlik K, Pankiewicz K, Pierzynski P, Sierdzinski J, Aleksejeva E, Salumets A BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):15.
PMID: 39789542 PMC: 11715555. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03531-z.