The Impact of a Multi-domain Intervention on Cerebral Glucose Metabolism: Analysis from the Randomized Ancillary FDG PET MAPT Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial (MAPT) was designed to assess the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, multidomain intervention (MI), or a combination of both on cognition. Although the MAPT study was negative, an effect of MI in maintaining cognitive functions compared to placebo group was showed in positive amyloid subjects. A FDG PET study (MAPT-NI) was implemented to test the impact of MI on brain glucose metabolism.
Methods: MAPT-NI was a randomized, controlled parallel-group single-center study, exploring the effect of MI on brain glucose metabolism. Participants were non-demented and had memory complaints, limitation in one instrumental activity of daily living, or slow gait. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to "MI group" or "No MI group." The MI consisted of group sessions focusing on 3 domains: cognitive stimulation, physical activity, nutrition, and a preventive consultation. [F]FDG PET scans were performed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging scans at baseline. The primary objective was to evaluate the MI effect on brain glucose metabolism assessed by [F]FDG PET imaging at 6 months. The primary outcome was the quantification of regional metabolism rate for glucose in cerebral regions involved early in Alzheimer disease by relative semi-quantitative SUVr (FDG-based AD biomarker). An exploratory voxel-wise analysis was performed to assess the effect of MI on brain glucose metabolism without anatomical hypothesis.
Results: The intention-to-treat population included 67 subjects (34 in the MI group and 33 in the No MI group. No significant MI effect was observed on primary outcome at 6 months. In the exploratory voxel-wise analysis, we observed a difference in favor of MI group on the change of cerebral glucose metabolism in limbic lobe (right hippocampus, right posterior cingulate, left posterior parahippocampal gyrus) at 6 months.
Conclusions: MI failed to show an effect on metabolism in FDG-based AD biomarker, but exploratory analysis suggested positive effect on limbic system metabolism. This finding could suggest a delay effect of MI on AD progression.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT01513252 .
Siette J, Dodds L, Brooks C, Deckers K, Kohler S, Armitage C BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):619.
PMID: 39953418 PMC: 11829373. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21641-7.
Cognitive Interventions: Symptomatic or Disease-Modifying Treatments in the Brain?.
Bellelli F JAR Life. 2024; 13:60-64.
PMID: 38808149 PMC: 11130643. DOI: 10.14283/jarlife.2024.8.
Perus L, Mangin J, Deverdun J, Gutierrez L, Gourieux E, Fischer C Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 14:971220.
PMID: 36705622 PMC: 9871772. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.971220.
Perus L, Busto G, Mangin J, Le Bars E, Gabelle A Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:1014559.
PMID: 36506466 PMC: 9730537. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1014559.
Gutierrez L, Folch A, Rojas M, Cantero J, Atienza M, Folch J Nutrients. 2021; 13(11).
PMID: 34835984 PMC: 8621754. DOI: 10.3390/nu13113728.