» Articles » PMID: 33075063

Older Adults Preserve Accuracy but Not Precision in Explicit and Implicit Rhythmic Timing

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Oct 19
PMID 33075063
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aging brings with it several forms of neurophysiological and cognitive deterioration, but whether a decline in temporal processing is part of the aging process is unclear. The current study investigated whether this timing deficit has a cause independent of those of memory and attention using rhythmic stimuli that reduce the demand for these higher cognitive functions. In Study 1, participants took part in two rhythmic timing tasks: explicit and implicit. Participants had to distinguish regular from irregular sequences while processing temporal information explicitly or implicitly. Results showed that while the accuracy in the implicit timing task was preserved, older adults had more noise in their performance in the explicit and implicit tasks. In Study 2, participants took part in a dual-implicit task to explore whether the performance of temporal tasks differed with increasing task difficulty. We found that increasing task difficulty magnifies age-related differences.

Citing Articles

The effect of auditory rhythm on the temporal allocation of visual attention in aging.

Xu Z, Huang J, Shen Y, Ren Y, Gao Y, Guo T Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1529967.

PMID: 40008337 PMC: 11851195. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1529967.


Resting heart rate (variability) and cognition relationships reveal cognitively healthy individuals with pathological amyloid/tau ratio.

Molloy C, Choy E, Arechavala R, Buennagel D, Nolty A, Spezzaferri M Front Epidemiol. 2023; 3.

PMID: 37587981 PMC: 10428767. DOI: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1168847.


The effect of rhythm on selective listening in multiple-source environments for young and older adults.

Pearson D, Shen Y, McAuley J, Kidd G Hear Res. 2023; 435:108789.

PMID: 37276686 PMC: 10460128. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108789.


Differential sensitivity to speech rhythms in young and older adults.

Pearson D, Shen Y, McAuley J, Kidd G Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1160236.

PMID: 37251054 PMC: 10213510. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1160236.


Explicit and implicit timing in older adults: Dissociable associations with age and cognitive decline.

Capizzi M, Visalli A, Faralli A, Mioni G PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0264999.

PMID: 35294473 PMC: 8926191. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264999.


References
1.
Matthews W, Meck W . Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychol Bull. 2016; 142(8):865-907. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000045. View

2.
Rao S, Mayer A, Harrington D . The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4(3):317-23. DOI: 10.1038/85191. View

3.
Baudouin A, Vanneste S, Isingrini M, Pouthas V . Differential involvement of internal clock and working memory in the production and reproduction of duration: a study on older adults. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005; 121(3):285-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.07.004. View

4.
Lustig C, Meck W . Modality differences in timing and temporal memory throughout the lifespan. Brain Cogn. 2011; 77(2):298-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.007. View

5.
Coull J, Nobre A . Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008; 18(2):137-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.011. View