» Articles » PMID: 33072786

Deep Learning for Diagnostic Binary Classification of Multiple-Lesion Skin Diseases

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Oct 19
PMID 33072786
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diagnosis of skin diseases is often challenging and computer-aided diagnostic tools are urgently needed to underpin decision making. To develop a convolutional neural network model to classify clinically relevant selected multiple-lesion skin diseases, this in accordance to the STARD guidelines. This was an image-based retrospective study using multi-task learning for binary classification. A VGG-16 model was trained on 16,543 non-standardized images. Image data was distributed in training set (80%), validation set (10%), and test set (10%). All images were collected from a clinical database of a Danish population attending one dermatological department. Included was patients categorized with ICD-10 codes related to acne, rosacea, psoriasis, eczema, and cutaneous t-cell lymphoma. Acne was distinguished from rosacea with a sensitivity of 85.42% CI 72.24-93.93% and a specificity of 89.53% CI 83.97-93.68%, cutaneous t-cell lymphoma was distinguished from eczema with a sensitivity of 74.29% CI 67.82-80.05% and a specificity of 84.09% CI 80.83-86.99%, and psoriasis from eczema with a sensitivity of 81.79% CI 78.51-84.76% and a specificity of 73.57% CI 69.76-77.13%. All results were based on the test set. The performance rates reported were equal or superior to those reported for general practitioners with dermatological training, indicating that computer-aided diagnostic models based on convolutional neural network may potentially be employed for diagnosing multiple-lesion skin diseases.

Citing Articles

Analysis of the use of digital technologies in the preliminary diagnosis of dermatological diseases: a systematic review.

Sapaico-Alberto A, Olaya-Cotera S, Flores-Castaneda R Arch Dermatol Res. 2024; 317(1):146.

PMID: 39704835 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-03650-5.


Predicting Prognosis of Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides with Utilization of Machine Learning.

Mendi B, Sanli H, Insel M, Bayindir Aydemir B, Atak M Life (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39598170 PMC: 11595863. DOI: 10.3390/life14111371.


A Multi-model Deep Learning Architecture for Diagnosing Multi-class Skin Diseases.

Badr M, Elkasaby A, Alrahmawy M, El-Metwally S J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39482493 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01300-w.


Artificial Intelligence Smartphone Application for Detection of Simulated Skin Changes: An In Vivo Pilot Study.

Grove G, Reedtz G, Vangsgaard B, Eskandarani H, Haedersdal M, Andersen F Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(10):e70056.

PMID: 39366915 PMC: 11452258. DOI: 10.1111/srt.70056.


Physician Level Assessment of Hirsute Women and of Their Eligibility for Laser Treatment With Deep Learning.

Thomsen K, Jalaboi R, Winther O, Lomholt H, Lorentzen H, Hogsberg T Lasers Surg Med. 2024; 57(1):80-87.

PMID: 39308029 PMC: 11776445. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23843.


References
1.
Wilmer E, Gustafson C, Ahn C, Davis S, Feldman S, Huang W . Most common dermatologic conditions encountered by dermatologists and nondermatologists. Cutis. 2015; 94(6):285-92. View

2.
Fee J, McGrady F, Rosendahl C, Hart N . Dermoscopy Use in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2019; 9(2):98-104. PMC: 6502297. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0902a04. View

3.
Thomsen K, Iversen L, Titlestad T, Winther O . Systematic review of machine learning for diagnosis and prognosis in dermatology. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019; 31(5):496-510. DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1682500. View

4.
Tschandl P, Rinner C, Apalla Z, Argenziano G, Codella N, Halpern A . Human-computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition. Nat Med. 2020; 26(8):1229-1234. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0942-0. View

5.
Adamson A, Smith A . Machine Learning and Health Care Disparities in Dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2018; 154(11):1247-1248. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2348. View