» Articles » PMID: 33064087

XML Data and Knowledge-Encoding Structure for a Web-Based and Mobile Antenatal Clinical Decision Support System: Development Study

Overview
Journal JMIR Form Res
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2020 Oct 16
PMID 33064087
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Displeasure with the functionality of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) is considered the primary challenge in CDSS development. A major difficulty in CDSS design is matching the functionality to the desired and actual clinical workflow. Computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs) are used to formalize medical knowledge in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in a computable language. However, existing CIG frameworks require a specific interpreter for each CIG language, hindering the ease of implementation and interoperability.

Objective: This paper aims to describe a different approach to the representation of clinical knowledge and data. We intended to change the clinician's perception of a CDSS with sufficient expressivity of the representation while maintaining a small communication and software footprint for both a web application and a mobile app. This approach was originally intended to create a readable and minimal syntax for a web CDSS and future mobile app for antenatal care guidelines with improved human-computer interaction and enhanced usability by aligning the system behavior with clinical workflow.

Methods: We designed and implemented an architecture design for our CDSS, which uses the model-view-controller (MVC) architecture and a knowledge engine in the MVC architecture based on XML. The knowledge engine design also integrated the requirement of matching clinical care workflow that was desired in the CDSS. For this component of the design task, we used a work ontology analysis of the CPGs for antenatal care in our particular target clinical settings.

Results: In comparison to other common CIGs used for CDSSs, our XML approach can be used to take advantage of the flexible format of XML to facilitate the electronic sharing of structured data. More importantly, we can take advantage of its flexibility to standardize CIG structure design in a low-level specification language that is ubiquitous, universal, computationally efficient, integrable with web technologies, and human readable.

Conclusions: Our knowledge representation framework incorporates fundamental elements of other CIGs used in CDSSs in medicine and proved adequate to encode a number of antenatal health care CPGs and their associated clinical workflows. The framework appears general enough to be used with other CPGs in medicine. XML proved to be a language expressive enough to describe planning problems in a computable form and restrictive and expressive enough to implement in a clinical system. It can also be effective for mobile apps, where intermittent communication requires a small footprint and an autonomous app. This approach can be used to incorporate overlapping capabilities of more specialized CIGs in medicine.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Clinical Decision Support Systems for Pregnancy Care: Systematic Review.

Lin X, Liang C, Liu J, Lyu T, Ghumman N, Campbell B J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e54737.

PMID: 39283665 PMC: 11443205. DOI: 10.2196/54737.


Towards effective clinical decision support systems: A systematic review.

Hak F, Guimaraes T, Santos M PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272846.

PMID: 35969526 PMC: 9377614. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272846.

References
1.
de Clercq P, Blom J, Korsten H, Hasman A . Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support. Artif Intell Med. 2004; 31(1):1-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.02.003. View

2.
Khairat S, Marc D, Crosby W, Al Sanousi A . Reasons For Physicians Not Adopting Clinical Decision Support Systems: Critical Analysis. JMIR Med Inform. 2018; 6(2):e24. PMC: 5932331. DOI: 10.2196/medinform.8912. View

3.
Mulyar N, van der Aalst W, Peleg M . A pattern-based analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14(6):781-7. PMC: 2213484. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2389. View

4.
Keiffer M . Utilization of clinical practice guidelines: barriers and facilitators. Nurs Clin North Am. 2015; 50(2):327-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnur.2015.03.007. View

5.
Jeannot J, Scherer F, Pittet V, Burnand B, Vader J . Use of the World Wide Web to implement clinical practice guidelines: a feasibility study. J Med Internet Res. 2003; 5(2):e12. PMC: 1550559. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e12. View