» Articles » PMID: 29317380

Effectiveness and Appropriateness of MHealth Interventions for Maternal and Child Health: Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2018 Jan 11
PMID 29317380
Citations 70
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The application of mobile health (mHealth) technology in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) is increasing worldwide. However, best practice and the most effective mHealth interventions have not been reviewed systematically.

Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of mHealth interventions for RMNCH around the world were conducted to investigate their characteristics as well as the features and effectiveness of mHealth interventions.

Methods: Studies of mHealth interventions for RMNCH between January 2011 and December 2016 were retrieved from 6 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Medium). Comparable studies were included in a random-effects meta-analysis for both exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and antenatal checks (ANC). Descriptive analyses were conducted for mHealth studies with a range of study designs.

Results: Analyses of 245 studies were included, including 51 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results showed that there are increasing numbers of studies on mHealth interventions for RMNCH. Although 2 meta-analysis, one with 2 RCTs on EBF (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, 95% CI 1.34-3.08, I=25%) and the other with 3 RCTs on ANC (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13-1.79, I=78%), showed that mHealth interventions are more effective than usual care, almost half (43%) of RCTs showed negative or unclear results on mHealth interventions. Functions described in mHealth interventions were diverse, and the health stages covered were broad. However, single function or single stage appeared to be dominant among mHealth interventions compared with multiple functions or stages.

Conclusions: More rigorous evaluations are needed to draw consistent conclusions and to analyze mHealth products with multiple functions, especially those popular in the app markets.

Citing Articles

A Mobile-Based Approach to Enhance Knowledge of Infant and Young Child Feeding Among Teenage Mothers in Nigeria: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sosanya M, Adesanya O, Rufai H, Freeland-Graves J Nutrients. 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39940272 PMC: 11820066. DOI: 10.3390/nu17030414.


Assessing the effectiveness of the Pregnancy And Newborn Diagnostic Assessment system on the quality of antenatal care in Burkina Faso: A cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Coulibaly A, Sogo A, Chikvaidze N, Capello C, Gerbaba T, Kouanda S Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241298499.

PMID: 39664758 PMC: 11632870. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241298499.


Artificial intelligence applied to the study of human milk and breastfeeding: a scoping review.

Agudelo-Perez S, Botero-Rosas D, Rodriguez-Alvarado L, Espitia-Angel J, Raigoso-Diaz L Int Breastfeed J. 2024; 19(1):79.

PMID: 39639329 PMC: 11622664. DOI: 10.1186/s13006-024-00686-1.


Contextual success and pitfalls of mHealth service for maternal and child health in Africa: An Intervention, Context, Actors, Mechanism, and Outcome (ICAMO) framework guided systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Gilano G, Zeleke E, Dekker A, Fijten R BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):690.

PMID: 39438852 PMC: 11515713. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06885-2.


The role of the community of purpose in maternal mHealth interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa context.

Sowon K, Maliwichi P, Chigona W, Malata A Front Digit Health. 2024; 6:1343965.

PMID: 39328476 PMC: 11424603. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1343965.


References
1.
Shiferaw S, Spigt M, Tekie M, Abdullah M, Fantahun M, Dinant G . The Effects of a Locally Developed mHealth Intervention on Delivery and Postnatal Care Utilization; A Prospective Controlled Evaluation among Health Centres in Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0158600. PMC: 4934867. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158600. View

2.
Liu L, Johnson H, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn J . Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012; 379(9832):2151-61. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1. View

3.
McNabb M, Chukwu E, Ojo O, Shekhar N, Gill C, Salami H . Assessment of the quality of antenatal care services provided by health workers using a mobile phone decision support application in northern Nigeria: a pre/post-intervention study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0123940. PMC: 4420494. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123940. View

4.
You D, Hug L, Ejdemyr S, Idele P, Hogan D, Mathers C . Global, regional, and national levels and trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Lancet. 2015; 386(10010):2275-86. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00120-8. View

5.
Prakash V, Thukral A, Sankar M, Agarwal R, Paul V, Deorari A . Efficacy and acceptability of an "App on sick newborn care" in physicians from newborn units. BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16:84. PMC: 4784326. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0579-3. View